Therapies Department, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Mar 5;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04113-y.
To explore orthopaedic and musculoskeletal clinicians' views and experiences of legal, safety, safeguarding and security issues regarding the use of virtual consultations (VC) during the COVID-19 pandemic. A secondary objective was to suggest ways to overcome these issues.
A mixed method cross-sectional survey was conducted, seeking the views and experiences of orthopaedic and musculoskeletal medically qualified and Allied Health Professionals in the United Kingdom. Descriptive statistical analysis was employed for quantitative data and a qualitative content analysis undertaken for qualitative data. Findings were presented in accordance with the four key issues.
Two hundred and ninety professionals (206 physiotherapists, 78 medically qualified professionals, 6 'other' therapists) participated in the survey. Of the 290 participants, 260 (90%) were not using VC prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 248 respondents (86%) were unsure whether their professional indemnity insurance covered VC, 136 (47%) had considered how they would handle an issue of safeguarding whilst the remainder had not, 126 (43%) had considered what they would do if, during a virtual consultation, a patient suffered an injury (e.g. bang on their head) or a fall (e.g. mechanical or a medical event like syncope) and 158 (54%) reported they felt the current technological solutions are secure in terms of patient data. Qualitative data provided additional context to support the quantitative findings such as validity of indemnification, accuracy of diagnosis and consent using VC, safeguarding issues; and security and sharing of data. Potential changes to practice have been proposed to address these issues.
VC have been rapidly deployed since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic often without clear guidance or consensus on many important issues. This study identified legal, safeguarding, safety and security issues. There is an urgent need to address these and develop local and national guidance and frameworks to facilitate ongoing safe virtual orthopaedic practice beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.
探讨在 COVID-19 大流行期间,骨科和肌肉骨骼临床医生对虚拟咨询(VC)使用的法律、安全、保障和安全问题的看法和经验。次要目的是提出克服这些问题的方法。
采用混合方法横断面调查,征求英国骨科和肌肉骨骼医学合格和辅助卫生专业人员的意见和经验。对定量数据采用描述性统计分析,对定性数据采用定性内容分析。结果按照四个关键问题呈现。
290 名专业人员(206 名物理治疗师,78 名医学合格专业人员,6 名“其他”治疗师)参加了调查。在 290 名参与者中,260 名(90%)在 COVID-19 大流行之前没有使用 VC,248 名受访者(86%)不确定他们的专业赔偿保险是否涵盖 VC,136 名(47%)考虑过在保护问题时该怎么做,而其余的人则没有,126 名(43%)考虑过如果在虚拟咨询中,患者遭受伤害(例如头部撞击)或跌倒(例如机械或晕厥等医疗事件),他们会怎么做,158 名(54%)报告说他们认为当前的技术解决方案在患者数据方面是安全的。定性数据提供了更多的背景信息来支持定量结果,例如赔偿的有效性、使用 VC 进行诊断和同意的准确性、保障问题;以及数据的安全性和共享。已经提出了实践的潜在变化,以解决这些问题。
自 COVID-19 大流行开始以来,VC 已迅速部署,而对于许多重要问题,往往没有明确的指导或共识。本研究确定了法律、保障、安全和安全问题。迫切需要解决这些问题,并制定地方和国家指南和框架,以促进 COVID-19 大流行后持续安全的虚拟骨科实践。