Suppr超能文献

听觉组织困难是否是阅读障碍的原因?一个听觉神经科学的视角。

Difficulties in auditory organization as a cause of reading backwardness? An auditory neuroscience perspective.

机构信息

Centre for Neuroscience in Education, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK.

Division of Psychology, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

出版信息

Dev Sci. 2017 Nov;20(6). doi: 10.1111/desc.12457. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

Abstract

Over 30 years ago, it was suggested that difficulties in the 'auditory organization' of word forms in the mental lexicon might cause reading difficulties. It was proposed that children used parameters such as rhyme and alliteration to organize word forms in the mental lexicon by acoustic similarity, and that such organization was impaired in developmental dyslexia. This literature was based on an 'oddity' measure of children's sensitivity to rhyme (e.g. wood, book, good) and alliteration (e.g. sun, sock, rag). The 'oddity' task revealed that children with dyslexia were significantly poorer at identifying the 'odd word out' than younger children without reading difficulties. Here we apply a novel modelling approach drawn from auditory neuroscience to study the possible sensory basis of the auditory organization of rhyming and non-rhyming words by children. We utilize a novel Spectral-Amplitude Modulation Phase Hierarchy (S-AMPH) approach to analysing the spectro-temporal structure of rhyming and non-rhyming words, aiming to illuminate the potential acoustic cues used by children as a basis for phonological organization. The S-AMPH model assumes that speech encoding depends on neuronal oscillatory entrainment to the amplitude modulation (AM) hierarchy in speech. Our results suggest that phonological similarity between rhyming words in the oddity task depends crucially on slow (delta band) modulations in the speech envelope. Contrary to linguistic assumptions, therefore, auditory organization by children may not depend on phonemic information for this task. Linguistically, it is assumed that 'book' does not rhyme with 'wood' and 'good' because the final phoneme differs. However, our auditory analysis suggests that the acoustic cues to this phonological dissimilarity depend primarily on the slower amplitude modulations in the speech envelope, thought to carry prosodic information. Therefore, the oddity task may help in detecting reading difficulties because phonological similarity judgements about rhyme reflect sensitivity to slow amplitude modulation patterns. Slower amplitude modulations are known to be detected less efficiently by children with dyslexia.

摘要

三十多年前,有人提出,单词形式在心理词汇中的“听觉组织”困难可能导致阅读困难。有人提出,儿童通过声学相似性使用韵律和头韵等参数来组织心理词汇中的单词形式,而这种组织在发育性阅读障碍中受到损害。这一文献基于对儿童对韵律(如 wood、book、good)和头韵(如 sun、sock、rag)敏感性的“奇特性”测量。“奇特性”任务表明,阅读障碍儿童在识别“奇异单词”方面明显不如没有阅读困难的年幼儿童。在这里,我们应用一种来自听觉神经科学的新的建模方法来研究儿童对押韵和非押韵单词的听觉组织的可能感觉基础。我们利用一种新的谱-幅度调制相位层次(S-AMPH)方法来分析押韵和非押韵单词的时频谱结构,旨在阐明儿童用作语音组织基础的潜在声学线索。S-AMPH 模型假设语音编码取决于神经元对语音中幅度调制(AM)层次的同步振荡。我们的结果表明,在奇特任务中押韵单词的语音相似性取决于语音包络的缓慢(δ波段)调制。因此,与语言假设相反,对于这个任务,儿童的语音组织可能不依赖于音位信息。从语言学的角度来看,人们认为“book”与“wood”和“good”不押韵,因为最后一个音素不同。然而,我们的听觉分析表明,这种语音差异的听觉线索主要取决于语音包络的较慢幅度调制,这被认为携带韵律信息。因此,奇特任务可能有助于检测阅读困难,因为关于韵律的语音相似性判断反映了对缓慢幅度调制模式的敏感性。较慢的幅度调制被认为是由阅读障碍儿童检测效率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验