Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Brain Res. 2013 Nov 6;1537:233-43. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.09.018. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
It is widely accepted that dyslexia is associated with difficulties in phonological awareness and that rhyme awareness in young children can predict later reading success. However, little is known regarding the underlying phonological mechanisms of rhyme awareness in dyslexia, as rhyme awareness is typically assessed using explicit behavioural measures that represent only the endpoint of processing and often lack phonological distracters. We examined event-related potentials (ERPs) in response to auditory word pairs that differed in phonological overlap during a rhyme judgement task given to 6-year-old beginning readers who were at risk for dyslexia (n=30) and typical-reading age-matched controls (n=29). ERPs were recorded in response to word pairs with various types of phonological overlap, including rhyming (e.g., wall-ball), non-rhyming overlapping (e.g., bell-ball) and non-rhyming unrelated (e.g., sock-ball) word pairs. Both groups of participants exhibited N400 responses for basic rhyme judgements vs. unrelated targets. In the typical-reading controls, the neural responses also differed between the rhyming targets and the non-rhyming overlapping targets, whereas neural responses to these targets were similar in the group of children at risk for dyslexia, indicating difficulties in their ability to process similar-sounding, non-rhyming targets. These findings suggest that typical-reading children solve the rhyme judgement task using a more analytical approach, whereas children who are at risk for dyslexia base their judgments on a comparison of overall sound similarity.
人们普遍认为,阅读障碍与语音意识困难有关,而幼儿的押韵意识可以预测日后的阅读成功。然而,对于阅读障碍者押韵意识的潜在语音机制知之甚少,因为押韵意识通常是通过使用仅代表处理终点的显性行为测量来评估的,而且往往缺乏语音干扰。我们在押韵判断任务中检查了 6 岁开始阅读的、有阅读障碍风险的儿童(n=30)和典型阅读年龄匹配的对照组(n=29)的听觉单词对的事件相关电位(ERP),这些单词对在语音重叠方面存在差异。ERP 是对具有各种类型语音重叠的单词对的反应进行记录的,包括押韵(例如,wall-ball)、非押韵重叠(例如,bell-ball)和非押韵不相关(例如,sock-ball)的单词对。两组参与者在基本押韵判断与不相关目标之间都表现出 N400 反应。在典型阅读对照组中,神经反应在押韵目标和非押韵重叠目标之间也有所不同,而在有阅读障碍风险的儿童组中,这些目标的神经反应相似,表明他们在处理相似发音、非押韵目标方面存在困难。这些发现表明,典型阅读的儿童使用更具分析性的方法来解决押韵判断任务,而有阅读障碍风险的儿童则根据整体声音相似性的比较来做出判断。