Sullivan Laura C, Chavera Teresa S, Jamshidi Raehannah J, Berg Kelly A, Clarke William P
Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2016 Dec;359(3):411-419. doi: 10.1124/jpet.116.232835. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
Opioid receptors expressed by peripheral pain-sensing neurons are functionally inactive for antinociceptive signaling under most basal conditions; however, tissue damage or exposure to inflammatory mediators (e.g., bradykinin) converts these receptors from a nonresponsive state to a functionally competent state. Here we tested the hypothesis that the basal, nonresponsive state of the mu- and delta-opioid receptors (MOR and DOR, respectively) is the result of constitutive receptor activity that activates desensitization mechanisms, resulting in MOR and DOR receptor systems that are constitutively desensitized. Consistent with our previous findings, under basal conditions, neither the MOR agonist [d-Ala,N-MePhe,Gly-ol]-enkephalin nor the DOR agonist [d-Pen]-enkephalin, inhibited prostaglandin E (PGE)-stimulated cAMP accumulation in peripheral sensory neurons in culture (ex vivo) or inhibited PGE-stimulated thermal allodynia in the rat hind paw in vivo. Prolonged treatment with naloxone induced MOR and DOR responsiveness both in vivo and ex vivo to a similar magnitude as that produced by bradykinin. Also similar to bradykinin, the effect of naloxone persisted for 60 minutes after washout of the ligand. By contrast, prolonged treatment with 6β-naltrexol, did not induce functional competence of MOR or DOR but blocked the effect of naloxone. Treatment with siRNA for β-arrestin-2, but not β-arrestin-1, also induced MOR and DOR functional competence in cultured peripheral sensory neurons. These data suggest that the lack of responsiveness of MOR and DOR to agonist for antinociceptive signaling in peripheral sensory neurons is due to constitutive desensitization that is likely mediated by β-arrestin-2.
在大多数基础条件下,外周痛觉感受神经元表达的阿片受体在抗伤害性信号传导方面功能不活跃;然而,组织损伤或暴露于炎症介质(如缓激肽)会使这些受体从无反应状态转变为功能上有活性的状态。在这里,我们测试了以下假设:μ-阿片受体和δ-阿片受体(分别为MOR和DOR)的基础无反应状态是组成型受体活性激活脱敏机制的结果,导致MOR和DOR受体系统组成型脱敏。与我们之前的研究结果一致,在基础条件下,MOR激动剂[d-Ala,N-MePhe,Gly-ol]-脑啡肽和DOR激动剂[d-Pen]-脑啡肽,均未抑制培养的外周感觉神经元(体外)中前列腺素E(PGE)刺激的cAMP积累,也未抑制体内大鼠后爪中PGE刺激的热痛觉过敏。用纳洛酮长期处理在体内和体外均诱导了MOR和DOR的反应性,其程度与缓激肽产生的相似。同样与缓激肽相似,纳洛酮的作用在洗脱配体后持续60分钟。相比之下,用6β-纳曲醇长期处理,并未诱导MOR或DOR的功能活性,但阻断了纳洛酮的作用。用针对β-抑制蛋白-2而非β-抑制蛋白-1的小干扰RNA处理,也在培养的外周感觉神经元中诱导了MOR和DOR的功能活性。这些数据表明,外周感觉神经元中MOR和DOR对激动剂抗伤害性信号传导缺乏反应性是由于可能由β-抑制蛋白-2介导的组成型脱敏。