Rodriquenz Maria Grazia, Rossi Sabrina, Ricci Riccardo, Martini Maurizio, Larocca Mario, Dipasquale Angelo, Quirino Michela, Schinzari Giovanni, Basso Michele, D'Argento Ettore, Strippoli Antonia, Barone Carlo, Cassano Alessandra
Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Padova Department of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (MI) Department of Pathology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome Department of Medical Oncology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(38):e4718. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004718.
Several evidences showed that patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) develop additional malignancies. However, thorough incidence of second tumors remains uncertain as the possibility of a common molecular pathogenesis.A retrospective series of 128 patients with histologically proven GIST treated at our institution was evaluated. Molecular analysis of KIT and PDGFR-α genes was performed in all patients. Following the involvement of KRAS mutation in many tumors' pathogenesis, analysis of KRAS was performed in patients with also second neoplasms.Forty-six out of 128 GIST patients (35.9%) had a second neoplasm. Most second tumors (52%) raised from gastrointestinal tract and 19.6% from genitourinary tract. Benign neoplasms were also included (21.7%). Molecular analysis was available for 29/46 patients with a second tumor: wild-type GISTs (n. 5), exon 11 (n. 16), exon 13 (n. 1), exon 9 (n. 1) KIT mutations, exon 14 PDGFR-α mutation (n. 2) and exon 18 PDGFR-α mutation (n. 4). KIT exon 11 mutations were more frequent between patients who developed a second tumor (P = 0.0003). Mutational analysis of KRAS showed a wild-type sequence in all cases. In metachronous cases, the median time interval between GIST and second tumor was 21.5 months.The high frequency of second tumors suggests that an unknown common molecular mechanism might play a role, but it is not likely that KRAS is involved in this common pathogenesis. The short interval between GIST diagnosis and the onset of second neoplasms asks for a careful follow-up, particularly in the first 3 years after diagnosis.
多项证据表明,胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者会发生其他恶性肿瘤。然而,由于存在共同分子发病机制的可能性,第二种肿瘤的确切发病率仍不确定。对在我们机构接受治疗的128例经组织学证实的GIST患者进行了回顾性研究。对所有患者进行了KIT和PDGFR-α基因的分子分析。鉴于KRAS突变参与了许多肿瘤的发病机制,对患有第二种肿瘤的患者也进行了KRAS分析。128例GIST患者中有46例(35.9%)发生了第二种肿瘤。大多数第二种肿瘤(52%)起源于胃肠道,19.6%起源于泌尿生殖道。其中也包括良性肿瘤(21.7%)。对46例患有第二种肿瘤的患者中的29例进行了分子分析:野生型GIST(5例)、外显子11(16例)、外显子13(1例)、外显子9(1例)KIT突变、外显子14 PDGFR-α突变(2例)和外显子18 PDGFR-α突变(4例)。发生第二种肿瘤的患者中KIT外显子11突变更为常见(P = 0.0003)。KRAS的突变分析在所有病例中均显示为野生型序列。在异时性病例中,GIST与第二种肿瘤之间的中位时间间隔为21.5个月。第二种肿瘤的高发生率表明,一种未知的共同分子机制可能起作用,但KRAS不太可能参与这种共同发病机制。GIST诊断与第二种肿瘤发生之间的间隔时间较短,因此需要进行仔细的随访,尤其是在诊断后的前3年。