Nurs Stand. 1993 Mar 3;7(24):40-41. doi: 10.7748/ns.7.24.40.s46.
Of the 26 contributors to Assessing Interventions: Traditional and Innovative Methods, Volume 4, there is only one nursing contributor; the majority of the remainder being medical doctors from the USA. Of the 246 pages, just nine are used by the nurse contributor, who says little that is new about qualitative methods in researching nursing care. The book needs to be read with the primary health-care team in mind.. It is divided into four sections. Section One considers basic issues in assessing interventions in primary care; the second section looks at the application of alternative methodologies - quantitative and qualitative. The third section explores specific topics and gives practical examples of how research was conducted by the authors and others within their disciplines. Section Four presents a panel discussion and considers future developments in primary care research. It will be of interest to anyone who may be presently involved in the evaluation of patient-centred research. The analysis and evaluation throughout the chapters, particularly in the third section, are worth having as an addendum to other research texts. Assessing Interventions will be of some value to lecturers in nursing, though perhaps not as a main text, but its price makes it accessible.
在《评估干预措施：传统与创新方法》第4卷的26位撰稿人中，只有一位是护理领域的；其余大部分是来自美国的医生。在246页的内容中，护理领域的撰稿人只用了9页，而且对于护理研究中的定性方法，几乎没有说出什么新内容。阅读这本书时需要将基层医疗团队考虑在内。它分为四个部分。第一部分探讨基层医疗中评估干预措施的基本问题；第二部分着眼于替代方法——定量和定性方法的应用。第三部分探讨特定主题，并给出作者及其所在学科的其他人如何开展研究的实际例子。第四部分进行了一场小组讨论，并思考基层医疗研究的未来发展。它会让任何当前可能参与以患者为中心的研究评估的人感兴趣。各章中的分析和评估，尤其是第三部分的，作为其他研究文本的附录很有价值。《评估干预措施》对护理专业的讲师会有一定价值，虽然可能不作为主要教材，但它的价格使其容易获取。
