Kabboord Anouk D, van Eijk Monica, Fiocco Marta, van Balen Romke, Achterberg Wilco P
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Geriatric Center and Nursing Home Antonius Binnenweg, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Nov 1;17(11):1066.e13-1066.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.07.028. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
A well-grounded functional prognosis during triage for rehabilitation is important, especially in older patients who experience the burden of comorbidity. However, it remains unclear what impact comorbidity has on functional outcome after rehabilitation.
To investigate the associations between comorbidity indexes and functional outcome after inpatient stroke or hip fracture rehabilitation. Furthermore, to identify which method of comorbidity assessment best reveals this relationship.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
An extensive search in PubMed, EMBASE, COCHRANE, Web of Science, and CINAHL of cited references and gray literature was carried out on March 4, 2016. This meta-analysis was conducted in agreement with the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. Studies were included if participants were adult patients with a stroke or hip fracture, participants received inpatient rehabilitation, comorbidity was assessed with a valid index, and functional status was an outcome measure. Two reviewers independently extracted data; according to the predefined data extraction plan, included studies were independently evaluated on risk of bias.
Twenty studies were eligible for review, and 7 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled correlation between comorbidity and functional status at discharge was -0.43 [-0.69; -0.06]. Presence and strength of correlations differed between comorbidity indexes. Charlson index: range = 0.0 to -0.88 and 0%-1% explained variance (%var). Cumulative illness rating scale (CIRS) total or cumulative: range = -0.02 to -0.34 and unknown %var. CIRS-severity index: range = -0.25 to -0.40 and 12-16 %var. Comorbidity-severity index: range = -0.39 and -0.47 and 5 %var. Liu index: range = -0.28 to -0.50 and 4-7 %var. When the index contained a severity weighting, the associations were more evident.
An association between comorbidity burden and functional outcome exists, albeit modest. Assessment of severity weighted comorbidity is preferred for estimating the functional prognosis after stroke and hip fracture rehabilitation.
在康复分诊过程中,有充分依据的功能预后评估很重要,尤其是对于承受合并症负担的老年患者。然而,合并症对康复后的功能结局有何影响仍不清楚。
研究合并症指数与住院脑卒中或髋部骨折康复后功能结局之间的关联。此外,确定哪种合并症评估方法最能揭示这种关系。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
2016年3月4日,在PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane、科学引文索引和护理学与健康领域数据库中对引用文献和灰色文献进行了广泛检索。本荟萃分析按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南进行。纳入标准为参与者为成年脑卒中或髋部骨折患者,接受住院康复治疗,使用有效指数评估合并症,且功能状态为结局指标。两名评价员独立提取数据;根据预先确定的数据提取计划,对纳入研究的偏倚风险进行独立评估。
20项研究符合综述标准,7项研究纳入荟萃分析。合并症与出院时功能状态的合并相关性为-0.43[-0.69;-0.06]。不同合并症指数之间的相关性存在与否及强度有所不同。查尔森指数:范围=0.0至-0.88,可解释方差百分比(%var)为0%-1%。累积疾病评定量表(CIRS)总分或累积分:范围=-0.02至-0.34,%var未知。CIRS严重程度指数:范围=-0.25至-0.40,%var为12%-16%。合并症严重程度指数:范围=-0.39至-0.47,%var为5%。刘指数:范围=-0.28至-0.50,%var为4%-7%。当指数包含严重程度权重时,相关性更明显。
合并症负担与功能结局之间存在关联,尽管关联程度不大。评估严重程度加权的合并症更有助于估计脑卒中及髋部骨折康复后的功能预后。