Suppr超能文献

狼疮肾炎发病机制的未来展望:事实、问题和潜在的因果治疗模式。

Future Perspectives on Pathogenesis of Lupus Nephritis: Facts, Problems, and Potential Causal Therapy Modalities.

机构信息

RNA and Molecular Pathology Research Group, Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway; Department of Radiology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Norwegian Center for Molecular Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

RNA and Molecular Pathology Research Group, Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

Am J Pathol. 2016 Nov;186(11):2772-2782. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.06.026. Epub 2016 Sep 21.

Abstract

Divergent incommensurable models have been developed to explain the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis. Most contemporary models favor a central role for anti-chromatin antibodies. How they exert their pathogenic effect has, however, endorsed conflicts that at least for now preclude insight into definitive pathogenic pathways. The following paradigms are contemporarily in conflict with each other: i) the impact of anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies that cross-react with inherent renal antigens, ii) the impact of anti-dsDNA antibodies targeting exposed chromatin in glomeruli, and iii) the impact of relative antibody avidity for dsDNA, chromatin fragments, or cross-reacting antigens. Aside from these three themes, the pathogenic role of T cells in lupus nephritis is not clear. These different models should be tested through a collaboration between scientists belonging to the different paradigms. If it turns out that there are different pathogenic pathways in lupus nephritis, the emerging pathogenic mechanism(s) may be encountered with new individual causal therapy modalities. Today, therapy is still unspecific and far from interfering with the cause(s) of the disorder. This review attempts to describe what we know about processes that may cause lupus nephritis and how such basic processes may be affected if we can specifically interrupt them. Secondary inflammatory mechanisms, cytokine signatures, activation of complement, and other contributors to inflammation will not be discussed herein; rather, the events that trigger these factors will be discussed.

摘要

已经开发出了不同的不可通约模型来解释狼疮肾炎的发病机制。大多数当代模型都倾向于认为抗染色质抗体起着核心作用。然而,它们如何发挥致病作用引发了冲突,这些冲突至少目前排除了对明确致病途径的洞察。目前相互冲突的范式有:i)抗双链 DNA(dsDNA)抗体的影响,这些抗体与固有肾抗原发生交叉反应,ii)针对肾小球中暴露的染色质的抗 dsDNA 抗体的影响,以及 iii)相对抗体对 dsDNA、染色质片段或交叉反应抗原的亲和力的影响。除了这三个主题之外,T 细胞在狼疮肾炎中的致病作用尚不清楚。这些不同的模型应该通过属于不同范式的科学家之间的合作来进行测试。如果事实证明狼疮肾炎存在不同的致病途径,那么新的致病机制可能会遇到新的个体化因果治疗方法。今天,治疗仍然是特异性的,远不能干扰疾病的原因。本综述试图描述我们对可能导致狼疮肾炎的过程的了解,以及如果我们能够特异性地阻断这些过程,这些基本过程可能会受到怎样的影响。本文不讨论继发性炎症机制、细胞因子特征、补体激活和其他炎症贡献者;相反,将讨论引发这些因素的事件。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验