• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助手术在妇科癌症中的临床经验。

The clinical experience of robot-assisted surgery in gynecologic cancer.

作者信息

Li Xue-Lian, Du Dan-Feng, Jiang Hua

机构信息

a Department of Gynecology , OB/GYN Hospital, Fudan University , Shanghai , China.

b Shanghai Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine-Related Diseases , Shanghai , China.

出版信息

Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2017 Apr;26(2):119-123. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2016.1228679. Epub 2016 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1080/13645706.2016.1228679
PMID:27667447
Abstract

The comparison of robotic and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer still needs to be studied. In all, 98 consecutive cases of patients with gynecologic cancer undergoing robot-assisted hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, and another 98 consecutive cases of conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy during the same period in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University were included. The duration of the operation, blood loss, drainage during the first 24 h after the operation, total hospital stay, hospital stay after the operation, lymph nodes collected, perioperative complications, and the cost of each operation for both procedures were recorded. The duration of the operation was longer, and the cost of each operation was almost seven times higher in the robot group than that in the conventional laparoscopy group. But the differences with regard to blood loss, drainage during the first 24 h after the operation, total hospital stay, hospital stay after operation, the lymph nodes collected, and the rate of perioperative complications were not statistically significant. Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) in gynecologic cancer is as feasible as conventional laparoscopic surgery. We recommend further studies about the cost and effect of RAS in gynecologic cancer.

摘要

机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术在妇科癌症中的比较仍有待研究。复旦大学附属妇产科医院共纳入了98例连续接受机器人辅助子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术的妇科癌症患者,以及同期98例连续接受传统腹腔镜子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术的患者。记录了手术时长、出血量、术后24小时内引流量、总住院时间、术后住院时间、采集的淋巴结数量、围手术期并发症以及两种手术方式各自的每项手术费用。机器人组的手术时长更长,每项手术费用几乎是传统腹腔镜组的七倍。但在出血量、术后24小时内引流量、总住院时间、术后住院时间、采集的淋巴结数量以及围手术期并发症发生率方面的差异无统计学意义。妇科癌症中的机器人辅助手术(RAS)与传统腹腔镜手术一样可行。我们建议进一步研究RAS在妇科癌症中的成本效益。

相似文献

1
The clinical experience of robot-assisted surgery in gynecologic cancer.机器人辅助手术在妇科癌症中的临床经验。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2017 Apr;26(2):119-123. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2016.1228679. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
2
A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.一项关于机器人辅助与开放手术子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗子宫内膜癌的前瞻性比较研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Feb;25(2):250-6. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000357.
3
Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.妇科机器人单孔与传统腹腔镜手术:一项配对病例对照研究的临床结局与成本分析
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):760-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
4
Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.妇科肿瘤学中机器人手术项目的实施及与既往腹腔镜手术系列的比较。
Int J Surg Oncol. 2015;2015:814315. doi: 10.1155/2015/814315. Epub 2015 Feb 15.
5
Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.机器人辅助腹腔镜单孔手术在妇科肿瘤领域的可行性
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Feb;24(2):258-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
6
Extraperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy by Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy.机器人辅助腹腔镜腹膜外主动脉旁淋巴结切除术。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jul-Aug;25(5):861-866. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.040. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
7
Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌:一项随机对照试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):588.e1-588.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
8
[Gynecologic robotic surgery and our initial experience].[妇科机器人手术及我们的初步经验]
Ceska Gynekol. 2010 Dec;75(6):512-7.
9
[Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: Retrospective and comparative study with laparotomy and laparoscopy].[妇科肿瘤学中的机器人手术:与开腹手术和腹腔镜手术的回顾性比较研究]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012 Jun;41(4):353-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
10
Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.机器人辅助子宫切除术和淋巴结切除术的学习曲线和手术结果:与腹腔镜和开腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的病例对照比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):739-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Robot-Assisted Surgery in the Treatment of Gynecological Carcinoma and Malignancies: Introduction to the da Vinci Robotic Surgery System.机器人辅助手术在妇科癌症及恶性肿瘤治疗中的应用:达芬奇机器人手术系统简介
Cureus. 2023 Aug 6;15(8):e43035. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43035. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Robot-Assisted Surgery in Gynecology.妇科机器人辅助手术
Cureus. 2022 Sep 15;14(9):e29190. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29190. eCollection 2022 Sep.