Survival of corneal endothelium following exposure to a vitrification solution.

Corneal endothelium, a monolayer of cells lining the inner surface of the cornea, is particularly susceptible to freezing injury. Ice formation damages the structural and functional integrity of the endothelium, and this results in a loss of corneal transparency. Instead of freezing, an alternative method of cryopreservation is vitrification, which avoids damage associated with ice formation. Vitrification at practicable cooling rates, however, requires exposure of tissues to very high concentrations of cryoprotectants, and this can cause damage through chemical toxicity and osmotic stress. The effects of a vitrification solution (VS1) containing 2.62 mol/liter (20.5%, w/v) dimethyl sulfoxide, 2.62 mol/liter (15.5%, w/v) acetamide, 1.32 mol/liter (10%, w/v) propane-1,2-diol, and 6% (w/v) polyethylene glycol were studied on corneal endothelium. Endothelial function was assessed by monitoring corneal thickness during 6 hr of perfusion at 35 degrees C with a Ringer solution supplemented with glutathione and adenosine. Various dilutions of the vitrification solution were introduced and removed in a stepwise manner to mitigate osmotic stress. Survival of endothelium after exposure to VS1 or a solution containing 90% of the cryoprotectant concentrations in VS1 (90% VS1) was dependent on the duration of exposure, the temperature of exposure, and the dilution protocol. The basic dilution protocol was performed at 25 degrees C: corneas were transferred from 90% VS1 or VS1 into 50% VS1 for 15 min, followed by 25% VS1 for 15 min and finally into isosmotic Ringer solution. Using this protocol, corneal endothelium survived exposure to 90% VS1 for 15 min at -5 degrees C, but 5 min in VS1 at -5 degrees C was harmful and resulted in some very large and misshapen endothelial cells. This damage was not ameliorated by using a sucrose dilution technique; but endothelial function was improved when the temperature of exposure to VS1 was reduced from -5 to -10 degrees C. Exposure to VS1 for 5 min at -5 degrees C was well tolerated, however, when the temperature of the first dilution step into 50% VS1 was reduced from 25 to 0 degree C. The large, misshapen cells were not observed under these conditions nor after exposure to VS1 at -10 degrees C. These results suggested that damage was the result of cryoprotectant toxicity rather than osmotic stress. Thus, corneal endothelium survived exposure to two solutions of cryoprotectants, namely, 90% VS1 and VS1, that were sufficiently concentrated to vitrify. Whether corneas can be cooled fast enough in these solutions to achieve vitrification and warmed fast enough to avoid devitrification remains to be determined.