Worth Andrew P, Patlewicz Grace
European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Dupont Haskell Global Centers for Health and Environmental Sciences, Newark, DE, USA.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;856:317-342. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-33826-2_13.
In this chapter, we explain how Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment (IATA) offer a means of integrating and translating the data generated by toxicity testing methods, thereby serving as flexible and suitable tools for toxicological decision making in the twenty-first century. In addition to traditional in vitro and in vivo testing methods, IATA are increasingly incorporating newly developed in vitro systems and measurement technologies such as high throughput screening and high content imaging. Computational approaches are also being used in IATA development, both as a means of generating data (e.g. QSARs), interpreting data (bioinformatics and chemoinformatics), and as a means of integrating multiple sources of data (e.g. expert systems, bayesian models). Decision analytic methods derived from socioeconomic theory can also play a role in developing flexible and optimal IATA solutions. Some of the challenges involved in the development, validation and implementation of IATA are also discussed.
在本章中,我们将解释综合测试与评估方法(IATA)如何提供一种整合和转化毒性测试方法所产生数据的手段,从而成为21世纪毒理学决策中灵活且适用的工具。除了传统的体外和体内测试方法外,IATA越来越多地纳入新开发的体外系统和测量技术,如高通量筛选和高内涵成像。计算方法也被用于IATA的开发,既作为生成数据(如定量构效关系)、解释数据(生物信息学和化学信息学)的手段,也作为整合多种数据来源(如专家系统、贝叶斯模型)的手段。源自社会经济理论的决策分析方法在开发灵活且最优的IATA解决方案中也能发挥作用。我们还将讨论IATA开发、验证和实施过程中涉及的一些挑战。