• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
What is the Diagnostic Accuracy of Aspirations Performed on Hips With Antibiotic Cement Spacers?对使用抗生素骨水泥间隔物的髋关节进行穿刺抽吸的诊断准确性如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):204-211. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5093-8. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
2
Synovial Cell Count Before Reimplantation Can Predict the Outcome of Patients with Periprosthetic Knee Infections Undergoing Two-stage Exchange.关节镜下清理术联合一期骨水泥旷置治疗高龄股骨颈骨折:一项前瞻性研究
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Sep 1;479(9):2061-2068. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001788.
3
Synovial Fluid Cell Count for Diagnosis of Chronic Periprosthetic Hip Infection.用于诊断慢性人工髋关节周围感染的滑液细胞计数
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 May 3;99(9):753-759. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00123.
4
Do serologic and synovial tests help diagnose infection in revision hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings or corrosion?血清学和滑膜检查有助于诊断金属对金属轴承或腐蚀的髋关节翻修术中的感染吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb;473(2):498-505. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3902-5.
5
Synovial aspiration and serological testing in two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection: evaluation before reconstruction with a mean follow-up of twenty seven months.人工关节感染两阶段翻修术中的滑膜抽吸和血清学检测:重建前评估,平均随访27个月。
Int Orthop. 2018 Feb;42(2):265-271. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3700-2. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
6
Saline lavage after a "dry tap".“干抽”后行盐水灌洗。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun;102-B(6_Supple_A):138-144. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B6.BJJ-2019-1679.R1.
7
The diagnostic thresholds for synovial fluid analysis in late periprosthetic infection of the hip depend on the duration of symptoms.髋关节假体周围感染晚期关节液分析的诊断阈值取决于症状持续时间。
Bone Joint J. 2016 Oct;98-B(10):1355-1359. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.37615.
8
Utility of Serum Inflammatory and Synovial Fluid Counts in the Diagnosis of Infection in Taper Corrosion of Dual Taper Modular Stems.血清炎症指标及滑液计数在双锥度模块化柄部锥形腐蚀感染诊断中的应用价值
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9):1997-2003. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.020. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
9
The Leukocyte Esterase Test for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is Not Affected by Prior Antibiotic Administration.白细胞酯酶试验对假体周围关节感染的诊断不受先前抗生素使用的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Apr 17;101(8):739-744. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00615.
10
Synovial Cytokines and the MSIS Criteria Are Not Useful for Determining Infection Resolution After Periprosthetic Joint Infection Explantation.滑膜细胞因子和MSIS标准对确定人工关节感染翻修术后感染是否消退并无帮助。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1630-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4710-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Postoperative Infection After Esophageal Injury in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes.颈椎前路手术中食管损伤后的术后感染:诊断、管理及结果的综合综述
J Clin Med. 2025 May 7;14(9):3244. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093244.
2
Upcoming evidence in clinical practice of two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection.两阶段翻修术治疗人工关节感染的临床实践中即将出现的证据。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 May 18;25(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00767-1.
3
Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI) and Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR) Are Predictors of Good Outcomes in Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infections of Lower Limbs: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)和单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)是下肢人工关节感染手术治疗良好预后的预测指标:一项单中心回顾性分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 23;12(9):867. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12090867.
4
Rotational Thromboelastometry as a Diagnostic Tool for Persistent Infection in Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty.旋转血栓弹力图作为两阶段翻修关节置换术中持续性感染的诊断工具
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 27;13(7):1942. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071942.
5
Interval between two-stage exchanges: what is optimal and how do you know?两阶段翻修之间的间隔时间:最佳间隔是多久以及如何确定?
Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul 5;5(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00185-4.
6
Role of joint aspiration before re-implantation in patients with a cement spacer in place.在使用骨水泥间隔器的患者重新植入前进行关节穿刺的作用。
World J Orthop. 2022 Jun 18;13(6):615-621. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i6.615.
7
Fluoroscopic-guided procedures of the lower extremity.下肢荧光透视引导下的操作
Skeletal Radiol. 2023 May;52(5):855-874. doi: 10.1007/s00256-022-04139-w. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
8
Value of ultrasound-guided aspiration of hip arthroplasties performed in an orthopedic clinic by orthopedic surgeons.骨科医生在骨科诊所进行的髋关节置换术超声引导下抽吸的价值。
J Bone Jt Infect. 2021 Nov 10;6(9):393-403. doi: 10.5194/jbji-6-393-2021. eCollection 2021.
9
Diagnosis and management of infected arthroplasty.感染性人工关节置换术的诊断与处理
SICOT J. 2021;7:54. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2021054. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
10
When Total Joint Arthroplasty After Septic Arthritis Can Be Safely Performed.脓毒性关节炎后何时可安全进行全关节置换术。
JB JS Open Access. 2021 May 13;6(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00146. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Positive Culture During Reimplantation Increases the Risk of Subsequent Failure in Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty.再植入期间培养结果呈阳性会增加二期翻修置换术中后续失败的风险。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Aug 3;98(15):1313-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01469.
2
Are Frozen Sections and MSIS Criteria Reliable at the Time of Reimplantation of Two-stage Revision Arthroplasty?在两阶段翻修关节成形术再次植入时,冰冻切片和微卫星不稳定性(MSIS)标准是否可靠?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1619-26. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4673-3.
3
Do serologic and synovial tests help diagnose infection in revision hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings or corrosion?血清学和滑膜检查有助于诊断金属对金属轴承或腐蚀的髋关节翻修术中的感染吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb;473(2):498-505. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3902-5.
4
Definition of periprosthetic joint infection.人工关节周围感染的定义。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jul;29(7):1331. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.009. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
5
Serum and synovial fluid analysis for diagnosing chronic periprosthetic infection in patients with inflammatory arthritis.血清和滑液分析在诊断炎症性关节炎患者慢性假体周围感染中的应用。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Apr 4;94(7):594-600. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01318.
6
Preoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: role of aspiration.人工关节置换术后感染的术前诊断:关节穿刺抽吸的作用。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Apr;196(4):875-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5160.
7
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves.pROC:一个用于 R 和 S+的开源软件包,用于分析和比较 ROC 曲线。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 17;12:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-77.
8
What is the role of serological testing between stages of two-stage reconstruction of the infected prosthetic knee?在感染性假体膝关节二期重建的两个阶段之间,血清学检测的作用是什么?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Apr;469(4):1002-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1619-7.
9
Perioperative testing for persistent sepsis following resection arthroplasty of the hip for periprosthetic infection.髋关节置换术后假体周围感染行关节切除成形术后持续性脓毒症的围手术期检测。
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep;25(6 Suppl):87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.05.006.
10
Staged revision for knee arthroplasty infection: what is the role of serologic tests before reimplantation?膝关节置换术后感染的分期翻修:再植入前血清学检查的作用是什么?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jul;467(7):1699-705. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0742-9. Epub 2009 Feb 25.

对使用抗生素骨水泥间隔物的髋关节进行穿刺抽吸的诊断准确性如何?

What is the Diagnostic Accuracy of Aspirations Performed on Hips With Antibiotic Cement Spacers?

作者信息

Newman Jared M, George Jaiben, Klika Alison K, Hatem Stephen F, Barsoum Wael K, Trevor North W, Higuera Carlos A

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, A41, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.

Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):204-211. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5093-8. Epub 2016 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1007/s11999-016-5093-8
PMID:27672013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5174056/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection is a serious complication after THA and commonly is treated with a two-stage revision. Antibiotic-eluting cement spacers are placed for local delivery of antibiotics. Aspirations may be performed before the second-stage reimplantation for identification of persistent infection. However, limited data exist regarding the diagnostic parameters of synovial fluid aspiration with or without saline lavage from a hip with an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) For hips with antibiotic cement spacers, does saline lavage influence the diagnostic validity of aspirations? (2) What is the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative aspirations performed on hips with antibiotic cement spacers using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, stratified by saline and nonlavage? (3) For hips with antibiotic spacers, what are the optimal thresholds for synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count and polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) percentage for diagnosing infections?

METHODS

One hundred seventy-four hips (155 patients) with antibiotic-eluting cement spacers inserted between October 2012 and July 2015 were reviewed. Of these, 98 hips (80 patients) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis (77 nonlavage, 21 saline lavage aspirations). Laboratory data from the aspiration and preoperative workup and intraoperative details were collected. Infection status of each hip procedure was determined based on a modified MSIS criteria using serologic, histologic, and intraoperative findings (sinus tract communicating with the joint at surgery or two positive intraoperative periprosthetic cultures with the same organism or two of the three following criteria: elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] [> 30 mm/hour] and C-reactive protein [CRP] [> 10 mg/L], a single positive intraoperative periprosthetic tissue culture, or a positive histologic analysis of periprosthetic tissue [> 5 neutrophils per high power field]). The diagnostic parameters were calculated for the MSIS criteria thresholds for synovial fluid (ie, WBC count > 3000 cells/µL and PMN percentage > 80%). Optimal thresholds were calculated for the corrected synovial WBC count and PMN percentage with a receiver operating characteristic curve. Separate analyses were performed for the hips with successful aspirations (nonlavage group) and those with saline lavage aspirations.

RESULTS

The WBC count and PMN percentage were higher in hips with infection than in hips without infection when nonlavage aspirations were done (WBC count, 6680 cells/µL ± 6980 cells/µL vs 2001 ± 4825; mean difference, 4679; 95% CI, 923-8436; p = 0.015; PMN percentage, 83% ± 13% vs 44% ± 30%; mean difference, 39%; 95% CI, 39%-49%; p < 0.001) and the findings between infected and noninfected aspirations were not different when saline lavage aspirations were done (WBC count, 782 cells/µL ± 696 vs 307 cells/µL ± 343; mean difference, 475; 95% CI, -253 to 1203; p = 0.161; PMN percentage, 67% ± 15% vs 58% ± 28%; mean difference, 10%; 95% CI, -11% to 30%; p = 0.331). Aspirations performed without lavage yielded good diagnostic accuracy in all parameters (WBC count, 78% [95% CI, 70%-86%]; PMN percentage. 79% [95% CI, 70%-88%]; positive culture: 84% [95% CI, 81%-90%]; at least one of the above: 79% [95% CI, 70%-88%]); but in the saline lavage group, none had WBC counts above the threshold (diagnostic accuracies for WBC count, 0%; PMN percentage, 71% [95% CI, 62%-86%]; positive culture, 76% [95% CI, 76%-86%]; at least one: 71% [95% CI, 57%-91%]). Because saline lavage did not result in differences between aspirations from infected and noninfected hips, we calculated the optimal thresholds in the nonlavage group only; the optimal threshold for synovial WBC count was 1166 cells/µL and for synovial PMN the percentage was 68%, which corresponds to WBC count diagnostic accuracy of 78% (95% CI, 69%-87%) and PMN percentage accuracy of 78% (95% CI, 69%-87%).

CONCLUSIONS

Because the MSIS criteria thresholds resulted in suboptimal sensitivities owing to a higher number of false negatives, we recommend considering lower WBC count and PMN percentage thresholds for hip-spacer aspirations. Furthermore, the WBC count and PMN percentage results from aspirations performed with saline lavage are not reliable for treatment decisions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

摘要

背景

人工关节周围感染是全髋关节置换术后的一种严重并发症,通常采用两阶段翻修术治疗。抗生素骨水泥间隔物用于局部抗生素递送。在二期再植入前可进行穿刺抽吸以确定是否存在持续性感染。然而,关于使用或不使用生理盐水冲洗带有抗生素负载骨水泥间隔物的髋关节滑膜液穿刺抽吸的诊断参数的数据有限。

问题/目的:我们提出以下问题:(1)对于带有抗生素骨水泥间隔物的髋关节,生理盐水冲洗是否会影响穿刺抽吸的诊断有效性?(2)使用肌肉骨骼感染学会(MSIS)标准,对带有抗生素骨水泥间隔物的髋关节进行术前穿刺抽吸的诊断准确性如何,按是否冲洗生理盐水分层?(3)对于带有抗生素间隔物的髋关节,用于诊断感染的滑膜液白细胞(WBC)计数和多形核中性粒细胞(PMN)百分比的最佳阈值是多少?

方法

回顾了2012年10月至2015年7月期间插入抗生素骨水泥间隔物的174例髋关节(155例患者)。其中,98例髋关节(80例患者)符合纳入标准并纳入分析(77例未冲洗,21例生理盐水冲洗穿刺抽吸)。收集了穿刺抽吸和术前检查的实验室数据以及术中详细信息。根据改良的MSIS标准,使用血清学、组织学和术中发现(手术时窦道与关节相通或术中假体周围两次培养出相同微生物阳性,或以下三项标准中的两项:红细胞沉降率[ESR]升高[>30mm/小时]和C反应蛋白[CRP]升高[>10mg/L]、术中假体周围组织培养单次阳性、或假体周围组织组织学分析阳性[每高倍视野>5个中性粒细胞])确定每个髋关节手术的感染状态。计算了MSIS标准滑膜液阈值(即WBC计数>3000个细胞/µL和PMN百分比>80%)的诊断参数。使用受试者工作特征曲线计算校正后的滑膜WBC计数和PMN百分比的最佳阈值。对穿刺抽吸成功的髋关节(未冲洗组)和进行生理盐水冲洗穿刺抽吸的髋关节分别进行分析。

结果

未冲洗穿刺抽吸时,感染髋关节的WBC计数和PMN百分比高于未感染髋关节(WBC计数,6680个细胞/µL±6980个细胞/µL对2001±4825;平均差异,4679;95%CI,923 - 8436;p = 0.015;PMN百分比,83%±13%对44%±30%;平均差异,39%;95%CI,39% - 49%;p < 0.001),而进行生理盐水冲洗穿刺抽吸时,感染与未感染穿刺抽吸的结果无差异(WBC计数,782个细胞/µL±696对307个细胞/µL±343;平均差异,475;95%CI,-253至1203;p = 0.161;PMN百分比,67%±15%对58%±28%;平均差异,10%;95%CI,-11%至30%;p = 0.331)。未冲洗的穿刺抽吸在所有参数中均具有良好诊断准确性(WBC计数,78%[95%CI,70% - 86%];PMN百分比,79%[95%CI,70% - 88%];阳性培养:84%[95%CI,81% - 90%];上述至少一项:79%[95%CI,70% - 88%]);但在生理盐水冲洗组中,无WBC计数高于阈值的情况(WBC计数诊断准确性,0%;PMN百分比,71%[95%CI,62% - 86%];阳性培养,76%[95%CI,76% - 86%];至少一项:71%[95%CI,57% - 91%])。由于生理盐水冲洗未导致感染与未感染髋关节穿刺抽吸结果出现差异,我们仅在未冲洗组中计算了最佳阈值;滑膜WBC计数的最佳阈值为1166个细胞/µL,滑膜PMN百分比为68%,这对应WBC计数诊断准确性为78%(95%CI,69% - 87%),PMN百分比准确性为78%(95%CI,69% - 87%)。

结论

由于MSIS标准阈值因假阴性数量较多而导致敏感性欠佳,我们建议考虑降低髋关节间隔物穿刺抽吸的WBC计数和PMN百分比阈值。此外,生理盐水冲洗穿刺抽吸获得的WBC计数和PMN百分比结果对于治疗决策不可靠。

证据水平

III级,诊断性研究。