Rathbun Alan M, Shardell Michelle, Orwig Denise, Gruber-Baldini Ann L, Ostir Glenn, Hicks Gregory E, Miller Ram R, Hochberg Marc C, Magaziner Jay
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Nov;64(11):e171-e176. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14487. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
To compare the effect of prefracture depressive illness and postfracture depressive symptoms on changes in physical performance after hip fracture.
Longitudinal observational cohort.
Baltimore metropolitan area.
Older adults with hip fracture (N = 255).
Prefracture depressive illness (from medical records) at baseline and postfracture depressive symptoms at 2 months (using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) were measured. Physical performance was measured 2, 6, and 12 months after fracture using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), a composite metric of functional status with a score ranging from 0 to 12. Weighted estimating equations were used to assess mean SPPB over time, comparing participants with and without prefracture depressive illness and subjects with and without postfracture depressive symptoms.
Participants with prefracture depressive illness had an SPPB increase of 0.4 units (95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.5-1.3) from 2 to 6 months, smaller than the increase of 1.0 SPPB unit (95% CI = 0.4-1.6) in those without prefracture depressive illness. Participants with postfracture depressive symptoms had an SPPB increase of 0.2 units (95% CI = -1.0-1.5) from 2 to 12 months, and those without postfracture depressive symptoms had a larger increase of 1.2 units (95% CI = 0.6-1.8) over the same period. Nevertheless, prefracture depressive illness and postfracture depressive symptoms were not significantly associated with SPPB.
Neither prefracture depressive illness nor postfracture depressive symptoms were significantly associated with changes in physical performance after hip fracture, but the magnitude of estimates suggested possible clinically meaningful effects on functional recovery.
比较骨折前抑郁性疾病和骨折后抑郁症状对髋部骨折后身体机能变化的影响。
纵向观察队列研究。
巴尔的摩大都市区。
髋部骨折的老年人(N = 255)。
在基线时测量骨折前抑郁性疾病(从病历中获取),在2个月时测量骨折后抑郁症状(使用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表)。在骨折后2、6和12个月使用简短身体机能量表(SPPB)测量身体机能,这是一种功能状态的综合指标,分数范围为0至12。使用加权估计方程来评估随时间变化的平均SPPB,比较有和没有骨折前抑郁性疾病的参与者以及有和没有骨折后抑郁症状的受试者。
有骨折前抑郁性疾病的参与者从2个月到6个月的SPPB增加了0.4个单位(95%置信区间(CI)= -0.5 - 1.3),小于没有骨折前抑郁性疾病的参与者增加的1.0个SPPB单位(95% CI = 0.4 - 1.6)。有骨折后抑郁症状的参与者从2个月到12个月的SPPB增加了0.2个单位(95% CI = -1.0 - 1.5),而在同一时期没有骨折后抑郁症状的参与者增加幅度更大,为1.2个单位(95% CI = 0.6 - 1.8)。然而,骨折前抑郁性疾病和骨折后抑郁症状与SPPB均无显著关联。
骨折前抑郁性疾病和骨折后抑郁症状均与髋部骨折后身体机能的变化无显著关联,但估计值的大小表明可能对功能恢复有临床意义的影响。