Saver Jeffrey L, Goyal Mayank, van der Lugt Aad, Menon Bijoy K, Majoie Charles B L M, Dippel Diederik W, Campbell Bruce C, Nogueira Raul G, Demchuk Andrew M, Tomasello Alejandro, Cardona Pere, Devlin Thomas G, Frei Donald F, du Mesnil de Rochemont Richard, Berkhemer Olvert A, Jovin Tudor G, Siddiqui Adnan H, van Zwam Wim H, Davis Stephen M, Castaño Carlos, Sapkota Biggya L, Fransen Puck S, Molina Carlos, van Oostenbrugge Robert J, Chamorro Ángel, Lingsma Hester, Silver Frank L, Donnan Geoffrey A, Shuaib Ashfaq, Brown Scott, Stouch Bruce, Mitchell Peter J, Davalos Antoni, Roos Yvo B W E M, Hill Michael D
David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles.
University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1279-88. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.13647.
Endovascular thrombectomy with second-generation devices is beneficial for patients with ischemic stroke due to intracranial large-vessel occlusions. Delineation of the association of treatment time with outcomes would help to guide implementation.
To characterize the period in which endovascular thrombectomy is associated with benefit, and the extent to which treatment delay is related to functional outcomes, mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Demographic, clinical, and brain imaging data as well as functional and radiologic outcomes were pooled from randomized phase 3 trials involving stent retrievers or other second-generation devices in a peer-reviewed publication (by July 1, 2016). The identified 5 trials enrolled patients at 89 international sites.
Endovascular thrombectomy plus medical therapy vs medical therapy alone; time to treatment.
The primary outcome was degree of disability (mRS range, 0-6; lower scores indicating less disability) at 3 months, analyzed with the common odds ratio (cOR) to detect ordinal shift in the distribution of disability over the range of the mRS; secondary outcomes included functional independence at 3 months, mortality by 3 months, and symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation.
Among all 1287 patients (endovascular thrombectomy + medical therapy [n = 634]; medical therapy alone [n = 653]) enrolled in the 5 trials (mean age, 66.5 years [SD, 13.1]; women, 47.0%), time from symptom onset to randomization was 196 minutes (IQR, 142 to 267). Among the endovascular group, symptom onset to arterial puncture was 238 minutes (IQR, 180 to 302) and symptom onset to reperfusion was 286 minutes (IQR, 215 to 363). At 90 days, the mean mRS score was 2.9 (95% CI, 2.7 to 3.1) in the endovascular group and 3.6 (95% CI, 3.5 to 3.8) in the medical therapy group. The odds of better disability outcomes at 90 days (mRS scale distribution) with the endovascular group declined with longer time from symptom onset to arterial puncture: cOR at 3 hours, 2.79 (95% CI, 1.96 to 3.98), absolute risk difference (ARD) for lower disability scores, 39.2%; cOR at 6 hours, 1.98 (95% CI, 1.30 to 3.00), ARD, 30.2%; cOR at 8 hours,1.57 (95% CI, 0.86 to 2.88), ARD, 15.7%; retaining statistical significance through 7 hours and 18 minutes. Among 390 patients who achieved substantial reperfusion with endovascular thrombectomy, each 1-hour delay to reperfusion was associated with a less favorable degree of disability (cOR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.76 to 0.93]; ARD, -6.7%) and less functional independence (OR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.71 to 0.92], ARD, -5.2% [95% CI, -8.3% to -2.1%]), but no change in mortality (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.93 to 1.34]; ARD, 1.5% [95% CI, -0.9% to 4.2%]).
In this individual patient data meta-analysis of patients with large-vessel ischemic stroke, earlier treatment with endovascular thrombectomy + medical therapy compared with medical therapy alone was associated with lower degrees of disability at 3 months. Benefit became nonsignificant after 7.3 hours.
使用第二代设备进行血管内血栓切除术对因颅内大血管闭塞导致的缺血性中风患者有益。明确治疗时间与预后的关联有助于指导治疗的实施。
确定血管内血栓切除术具有益处的时间段,以及治疗延迟与功能预后、死亡率和有症状的颅内出血的相关程度。
设计、设置和患者:人口统计学、临床和脑成像数据以及功能和放射学预后数据来自于一项同行评审出版物(截至2016年7月1日)中涉及支架取栓器或其他第二代设备的随机3期试验。确定的5项试验在89个国际地点招募了患者。
血管内血栓切除术联合药物治疗与单纯药物治疗;治疗时间。
主要结局是3个月时的残疾程度(改良Rankin量表范围为0 - 6;分数越低表明残疾程度越低),采用共同比值比(cOR)进行分析,以检测改良Rankin量表范围内残疾分布的有序变化;次要结局包括3个月时的功能独立性、3个月时的死亡率和有症状的出血性转化。
在5项试验中纳入的所有1287例患者(血管内血栓切除术联合药物治疗[n = 634];单纯药物治疗[n = 653])中(平均年龄66.5岁[标准差13.1];女性占47.0%),从症状发作到随机分组的时间为196分钟(四分位间距,142至267分钟)。在血管内治疗组中,从症状发作到动脉穿刺的时间为238分钟(四分位间距,180至302分钟),从症状发作到再灌注的时间为286分钟(四分位间距,215至363分钟)。在90天时,血管内治疗组的平均改良Rankin量表评分为2.9(95%置信区间,2.7至3.1),药物治疗组为3.6(95%置信区间,3.5至3.8)。血管内治疗组在90天时获得更好残疾预后(改良Rankin量表评分分布)的几率随着从症状发作到动脉穿刺时间的延长而下降:3小时时的cOR为2.79(95%置信区间,1.96至3.98),残疾评分较低的绝对风险差异(ARD)为39.2%;6小时时的cOR为1.98(95%置信区间,1.30至3.00),ARD为30.2%;8小时时的cOR为1.57(95%置信区间,0.86至2.88),ARD为15.7%;在7小时18分钟内均保持统计学显著性。在390例通过血管内血栓切除术实现充分再灌注的患者中,每延迟1小时再灌注,残疾程度更差(cOR,)。
在这项针对大血管缺血性中风患者的个体患者数据荟萃分析中,与单纯药物治疗相比,早期进行血管内血栓切除术联合药物治疗与3个月时较低的残疾程度相关。在7.3小时后益处变得不显著。 (注:原文中“在390例通过血管内血栓切除术实现充分再灌注的患者中,每延迟1小时再灌注,残疾程度更差(cOR,)。”此处cOR后面括号内容缺失,译文保留原文状态)