介入性疼痛管理程序的机构支付:拟议规则的影响。

Facility Payments for Interventional Pain Management Procedures: Impact of Proposed Rules.

作者信息

Manchikanti Laxmaiah, Singh Vijay, Hirsch Joshua A

机构信息

Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, KY, and University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.

Spine Pain Diagnostics Associates, Niagara, WI.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(7):E957-84.

DOI:
Abstract

UNLABELLED

In the face of the progressive implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), a significant regulatory regime, and the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released its proposed 2017 hospital outpatient department (HOPD) and ambulatory surgery center (ASC) payment rules on July 14, 2016, and the physician payment schedule was released July 15, 2016. U.S. health care costs continue to increase, occupying 17.5% of the gross domestic product (GDP) in 2014 and surpassing $3 trillion in overall health care expenditure. Solo and independent practices face unique challenges and many are being acquired by hospitals or larger groups. This transfer of services to hospital settings is indisputably leading to an increase in the net cost to the system. Comparison of facility payments for interventional techniques in HOPD, ASC, and in-office settings shows wide variation for multiple interventional techniques. Major discrepancies in payment schedules are related to higher payments for hospitals than comparable treatments in in-office settings and ASCs. In-office procedures, which have been converted to ASC procedures, are reimbursed at as high as 1,366% higher than ASCs and 2,156% higher than in-office settings. The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) has made recommendations on avoiding the discrepancies and site-of-service differentials in in-office settings, hospital outpatient settings, and ASCs. These have not been implemented by CMS. In addition, there have been slow reductions in reimbursements over the recent years, which continue to accumulate, leading to significant reductions in paymentsIn conclusion, equalization of site-of-service differentials will simultaneously improve reimbursement patterns for interventional pain management procedures, increase access and quality of care, and finally, reduce costs for CMS, extending Medicare solvency.

KEY WORDS

Hospital outpatient departments, ambulatory surgery centers, physician in-office services, interventional pain management, interventional techniques.

摘要

未标注

面对《平价医疗法案》(ACA)这一重要监管制度以及基于绩效的激励支付系统(MIPS)的逐步实施,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)于2016年7月14日发布了其2017年医院门诊部门(HOPD)和门诊手术中心(ASC)支付规则,医师支付时间表于2016年7月15日发布。美国医疗保健成本持续上升,2014年占国内生产总值(GDP)的17.5%,医疗保健总支出超过3万亿美元。个体和独立执业面临独特挑战,许多正被医院或更大的集团收购。这种服务向医院环境的转移无疑导致系统净成本增加。对HOPD、ASC和办公室环境中介入技术的机构支付进行比较,结果显示多种介入技术存在很大差异。支付时间表上的主要差异在于,医院的支付高于办公室环境和ASC中的可比治疗。已转换为ASC程序的办公室程序,报销额比ASC高1366%,比办公室环境高2156%。医疗保险支付咨询委员会(MedPAC)已就避免办公室环境、医院门诊环境和ASC中的差异及服务地点差异提出建议。但CMS尚未实施这些建议。此外,近年来报销额下降缓慢,且持续累积,导致支付大幅减少。总之,服务地点差异的均等化将同时改善介入性疼痛管理程序的报销模式,增加医疗服务的可及性和质量,最终降低CMS的成本,延长医疗保险偿付能力。

关键词

医院门诊部门;门诊手术中心;医师办公室服务;介入性疼痛管理;介入技术

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索