Grassi Giacomo, Figee Martjin, Stratta Paolo, Rossi Alessandro, Pallanti Stefano
1 Department of NEUROFARBA, University of Florence , Florence, Italy.
2 Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Behav Addict. 2016 Sep;5(3):398-400. doi: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.069. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
In our recently published article, we investigated the behavioral addiction model of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), by assessing three core dimensions of addiction in patients with OCD healthy participants. Similar to the common findings in addiction, OCD patients demonstrated increased impulsivity, risky decision-making, and biased probabilistic reasoning compared to healthy controls. Thus, we concluded that these results support the conceptualization of OCD as a disorder of behavioral addiction. Here, we answer to Abramovitch and McKay (2016) commentary on our paper and we support our conclusions by explaining how cognitive impulsivity is also a typical feature of addiction and how our results on decision-making and probabilistic reasoning tasks reflect cognitive impulsivity facets that are consistently replicated in OCD and addiction.
在我们最近发表的文章中，我们通过评估强迫症（OCD）患者和健康参与者成瘾的三个核心维度，研究了强迫症的行为成瘾模型。与成瘾的常见发现相似，与健康对照组相比，强迫症患者表现出更高的冲动性、冒险决策和有偏差的概率推理。因此，我们得出结论，这些结果支持将强迫症概念化为一种行为成瘾障碍。在此，我们回应阿布拉莫维奇和麦凯（2016年）对我们论文的评论，并通过解释认知冲动性如何也是成瘾的一个典型特征，以及我们在决策和概率推理任务上的结果如何反映在强迫症和成瘾中一致重复出现的认知冲动性方面，来支持我们的结论。
