Jayakar Prasanna, Gotman Jean, Harvey A Simon, Palmini André, Tassi Laura, Schomer Donald, Dubeau Francois, Bartolomei Fabrice, Yu Alice, Kršek Pavel, Velis Demetrios, Kahane Philippe
Brain Institute, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Florida, U.S.A.
Montreal Neurological Hospital and Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Epilepsia. 2016 Nov;57(11):1735-1747. doi: 10.1111/epi.13515. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
Many patients with medically refractory epilepsy now undergo successful surgery based on noninvasive diagnostic information, but intracranial electroencephalography (IEEG) continues to be used as increasingly complex cases are considered surgical candidates. The indications for IEEG and the modalities employed vary across epilepsy surgical centers; each modality has its advantages and limitations. IEEG can be performed in the same intraoperative setting, that is, intraoperative electrocorticography, or through an independent implantation procedure with chronic extraoperative recordings; the latter are not only resource intensive but also carry risk. A lack of understanding of IEEG limitations predisposes to data misinterpretation that can lead to denying surgery when indicated or, worse yet, incorrect resection with adverse outcomes. Given the lack of class 1 or 2 evidence on IEEG, a consensus-based expert recommendation on the diagnostic utility of IEEG is presented, with emphasis on the application of various modalities in specific substrates or locations, taking into account their relative efficacy, safety, ease, and incremental cost-benefit. These recommendations aim to curtail outlying indications that risk the over- or underutilization of IEEG, while retaining substantial flexibility in keeping with most standard practices at epilepsy centers and addressing some of the needs of resource-poor regions around the world.
现在,许多药物难治性癫痫患者基于非侵入性诊断信息成功接受了手术,但随着越来越复杂的病例被视为手术候选者,颅内脑电图(IEEG)仍在继续使用。IEEG的适应证和所采用的方式在各个癫痫手术中心有所不同;每种方式都有其优缺点。IEEG可以在相同的术中环境下进行,即术中皮质脑电图,也可以通过独立的植入程序进行慢性术后记录;后者不仅资源密集,而且有风险。对IEEG局限性缺乏了解易导致数据误解,进而可能导致在有手术指征时拒绝手术,或者更糟糕的是,进行错误切除并产生不良后果。鉴于缺乏关于IEEG的1类或2类证据,本文提出了基于共识的关于IEEG诊断效用的专家建议,重点是各种方式在特定底物或部位的应用,同时考虑到它们的相对疗效、安全性、简便性和增量成本效益。这些建议旨在减少可能导致IEEG使用过度或不足的边缘适应证,同时在符合癫痫中心的大多数标准做法并满足全球资源匮乏地区的一些需求方面保持相当大的灵活性。