Siedentopf F, Wowro E, Möckel M, Kentenich H, David M
Frauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus, Berlin.
Vivantes, Auguste-Viktoria-Klinikum, Klinik für Neurologie, Berlin.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016 Sep;76(9):952-959. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-104929.
Few studies have evaluated the utilisation of emergency gynaecological services, although lower abdominal pain (LAP) is one of the most common symptoms prompting emergency presentation. Although such pain may be caused by potentially life-threatening gynaecological diseases, very often no clinical cause is found. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of emergency presentations in order to enable quicker identification of real emergencies in routine clinical practice. Standardised, so-called first aid cards of 1066 consecutive patients with LAP presenting acutely to one emergency unit were analysed in this retrospective, cross-sectional study. Over one third of cases did not constitute actual medical emergencies on objective criteria, with investigations yielding "no pathological findings". Parameters were identified that more often lead to hospital admission, e.g. palpation of a mass/resistance or at least one pathological ultrasound finding. In addition, it was found that symptoms of longer duration (average 8 days), and not only acute LAP, were also often experienced by patients as emergencies. A diagnosis of "no pathological findings", which was common in our study, suggests a subjective experience of an emergency from the patient's point of view, although the possibility of unrecognised pathology has to be borne in mind. Apart from functional disorders, the origins of symptoms may include psychosomatic causes and psychosocial problems, which cannot be further defined in the emergency care setting. Also, the phenomenon of increased utilisation of emergency services parallel to the assumed opening hours of routine outpatient care facilities must be seen in a critical light.
尽管下腹部疼痛(LAP)是促使患者紧急就诊的最常见症状之一,但很少有研究评估急诊妇科服务的利用情况。虽然这种疼痛可能由潜在危及生命的妇科疾病引起,但通常找不到临床病因。本研究的目的是描述急诊就诊的特征,以便在常规临床实践中更快地识别真正的紧急情况。在这项回顾性横断面研究中,分析了连续1066例急性LAP并前往某急诊科室就诊患者的标准化所谓急救卡。根据客观标准,超过三分之一的病例并不构成实际医疗紧急情况,检查结果为“无病理发现”。确定了更常导致住院的参数,例如触及肿块/阻力或至少一项病理超声检查结果。此外,研究发现,病程较长(平均8天)的症状,不仅是急性LAP,患者也常常将其视为紧急情况。在我们的研究中常见的“无病理发现”诊断,从患者角度表明了对紧急情况的主观体验,尽管必须考虑未被识别的病理情况的可能性。除了功能障碍外,症状的起源可能包括心身原因和社会心理问题,在急诊护理环境中无法进一步明确。此外,必须以批判的眼光看待与常规门诊设施假定开放时间平行的急诊服务利用率增加的现象。