Tita Alan T N, Szychowski Jeff M, Boggess Kim, Saade George, Longo Sherri, Clark Erin, Esplin Sean, Cleary Kirsten, Wapner Ron, Letson Kellett, Owens Michelle, Abramovici Adi, Ambalavanan Namasivayam, Cutter Gary, Andrews William
From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (A.T.N.T., J.M.S., W.A.), Biostatistics (J.M.S., G.C.), and Pediatrics (N.A.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham; the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (K.B.), and Mission Hospital, Asheville (K.L.) - both in North Carolina; the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.S.), and the University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston (A.A.); Ochsner Health System, New Orleans (S.L.); the University of Utah (E.C., S.E.) and Intermountain Health Care (E.C., S.E.), Salt Lake City; Columbia University, New York (K.C., R.W.); and the University of Mississippi, Jackson (M.O.).
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 29;375(13):1231-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602044.
The addition of azithromycin to standard regimens for antibiotic prophylaxis before cesarean delivery may further reduce the rate of postoperative infection. We evaluated the benefits and safety of azithromycin-based extended-spectrum prophylaxis in women undergoing nonelective cesarean section.
In this trial conducted at 14 centers in the United States, we studied 2013 women who had a singleton pregnancy with a gestation of 24 weeks or more and who were undergoing cesarean delivery during labor or after membrane rupture. We randomly assigned 1019 to receive 500 mg of intravenous azithromycin and 994 to receive placebo. All the women were also scheduled to receive standard antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome was a composite of endometritis, wound infection, or other infection occurring within 6 weeks.
The primary outcome occurred in 62 women (6.1%) who received azithromycin and in 119 (12.0%) who received placebo (relative risk, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 0.68; P<0.001). There were significant differences between the azithromycin group and the placebo group in rates of endometritis (3.8% vs. 6.1%, P=0.02), wound infection (2.4% vs. 6.6%, P<0.001), and serious maternal adverse events (1.5% vs. 2.9%, P=0.03). There was no significant between-group difference in a secondary neonatal composite outcome that included neonatal death and serious neonatal complications (14.3% vs. 13.6%, P=0.63).
Among women undergoing nonelective cesarean delivery who were all receiving standard antibiotic prophylaxis, extended-spectrum prophylaxis with adjunctive azithromycin was more effective than placebo in reducing the risk of postoperative infection. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; C/SOAP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01235546 .).
剖宫产术前在标准抗生素预防方案中加用阿奇霉素可能会进一步降低术后感染率。我们评估了基于阿奇霉素的广谱预防方案在非选择性剖宫产妇女中的益处和安全性。
在美国14个中心进行的这项试验中,我们研究了2013名单胎妊娠、孕周≥24周且在分娩期间或胎膜破裂后行剖宫产的妇女。我们将1019名妇女随机分配接受500mg静脉注射阿奇霉素,994名妇女接受安慰剂。所有妇女还计划接受标准抗生素预防。主要结局是6周内发生的子宫内膜炎、伤口感染或其他感染的复合情况。
接受阿奇霉素治疗的62名妇女(6.1%)和接受安慰剂治疗的119名妇女(12.0%)出现了主要结局(相对风险,0.51;95%置信区间[CI],0.38至0.68;P<0.001)。阿奇霉素组和安慰剂组在子宫内膜炎发生率(3.8%对6.1%,P=0.02)、伤口感染发生率(2.4%对6.6%,P<0.001)和严重母体不良事件发生率(1.5%对2.9%,P=0.03)方面存在显著差异。在包括新生儿死亡和严重新生儿并发症的次要新生儿复合结局方面,组间无显著差异(14.3%对13.6%,P=0.63)。
在所有接受标准抗生素预防的非选择性剖宫产妇女中,加用阿奇霉素的广谱预防方案在降低术后感染风险方面比安慰剂更有效。(由尤妮斯·肯尼迪·施赖弗国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所资助;C/SOAP ClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT01235546。)