• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双平面扩展颞浅筋膜系统(SMAS)除皱术后应用SMAS组织转移进行唇部填充的长期分析

Long-term Analysis of Lip Augmentation With Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System (SMAS) Tissue Transfer Following Biplanar Extended SMAS Rhytidectomy.

作者信息

Richardson Matthew Allen, Rousso Daniel Elliott, Replogle William H

机构信息

Rousso Facial Plastic Surgery Clinic, Mountain Brook, Alabama.

Department of Family Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson.

出版信息

JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Jan 1;19(1):34-39. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1145.

DOI:10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1145
PMID:27684045
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

To our knowledge, long-term, objective results of lip augmentation using superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) tissue transfer beyond 1 year have not been previously described.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy, longevity, and safety of lip augmentation using SMAS tissue transfer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective single-blind cohort study was designed to evaluate all patients who underwent surgical lip augmentation using SMAS following rhytidectomy between January 1, 2000, and November, 16, 2015, at a private facial plastic surgery practice in Birmingham, Alabama. Preoperative photographs of each patient served as controls and were compared with postoperative photographs at 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years after lip augmentation. A total of 104 images (from 26 individual patients) were reviewed by 12 blinded observers using a validated lip augmentation grading scale.

EXPOSURES

Lip augmentation using SMAS.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Median lip volumes of all patients at each postoperative interval (3 months, 1 year, and 5 years) compared with preoperative lip volumes. Secondary outcome measures included postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 423 patients were identified who underwent surgical lip augmentation using SMAS. Sixty patients with approximately 5 years or more of postoperative photographs were reviewed for complications. Twenty-six patients had 3-month, 1-year, and 5-year postoperative follow-up photographs and were included in the photographic evaluation. The mean age of these patients at the time of surgery was 54.6 years (range, 41.2-80.6 years. Fifty-nine of the 60 patients (98.3%) were female. Two of 60 patients (3.3%) with 5 years or more of postoperative follow-up developed complications requiring intervention. Both the superior lip and the inferior lip showed statistically significant increases in volume at 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years (P ≤ .004 for the superior lip after 5 years; P ≤ .001 for all other comparisons) after SMAS lip augmentation. The greatest median increase was observed in the superior lip at 3 months, while the smallest median increase was observed for the inferior lip at 5 years. The degree of increase in median volume seemed to weaken slightly over time, but remained statistically significant even at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

SMAS lip augmentation is an effective and safe method for lip augmentation that can yield natural, long-lasting results with minimal risk. The degree of augmentation tends to fade slightly over time, but remains significant for at least 5 years postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

重要性

据我们所知,此前尚未描述过使用表浅肌肉腱膜系统(SMAS)组织转移进行唇部填充超过1年的长期客观结果。

目的

评估使用SMAS组织转移进行唇部填充的疗效、持久性和安全性。

设计、地点和参与者:一项回顾性单盲队列研究旨在评估2000年1月1日至2015年11月16日期间在阿拉巴马州伯明翰市一家私人面部整形手术诊所接受除皱术后使用SMAS进行手术唇部填充的所有患者。每位患者的术前照片作为对照,并与唇部填充后3个月、1年和5年的术后照片进行比较。12名盲法观察者使用经过验证的唇部填充分级量表对总共104张图像(来自26名个体患者)进行了评估。

暴露因素

使用SMAS进行唇部填充。

主要结局和测量指标

将所有患者在每个术后时间间隔(3个月、1年和5年)的唇部体积中位数与术前唇部体积进行比较。次要结局指标包括术后并发症。

结果

共确定423例接受使用SMAS进行手术唇部填充的患者。对60例有术后约5年或更长时间照片的患者进行了并发症评估。26例患者有术后3个月、1年和5年的随访照片,并纳入了照片评估。这些患者手术时的平均年龄为54.6岁(范围41.2 - 80.6岁)。60例患者中有59例(98.3%)为女性。60例有5年或更长时间术后随访的患者中有2例(3.3%)出现需要干预的并发症。在使用SMAS进行唇部填充后,上唇和下唇在3个月、1年和5年时的体积均有统计学显著增加(5年后上唇P≤0.004;所有其他比较P≤0.001)。上唇在3个月时观察到最大的中位数增加,而下唇在5年时观察到最小的中位数增加。中位数体积增加程度似乎随时间略有减弱,但即使在5年时仍具有统计学显著性。

结论和相关性

SMAS唇部填充是一种有效且安全的唇部填充方法,可产生自然、持久的效果且风险最小。填充程度往往会随时间略有消退,但术后至少5年仍很显著。

证据级别

3级。

相似文献

1
Long-term Analysis of Lip Augmentation With Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System (SMAS) Tissue Transfer Following Biplanar Extended SMAS Rhytidectomy.双平面扩展颞浅筋膜系统(SMAS)除皱术后应用SMAS组织转移进行唇部填充的长期分析
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Jan 1;19(1):34-39. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1145.
2
Nuances in Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Rhytidectomy.表浅肌肉腱膜系统除皱术中的细微差别。
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Aug;28(3):285-301. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2020.03.010.
3
Comparison of lip enhancement using autologous superficial musculoaponeurotic system tissue and postauricular fascia in conjunction with lip advancement.自体表浅肌肉腱膜系统组织联合耳后筋膜与唇部推进术用于唇部丰满的比较
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2010 Sep-Oct;12(5):342-8. doi: 10.1001/archfacial.2010.67.
4
Lip augmentation with superficial musculoaponeurotic system grafts: report of 103 cases.采用表浅肌肉腱膜系统移植物进行唇部增大术:103例报告。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Jan;109(1):319-26; discussion 327-8. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200201000-00050.
5
A Technique Using the Suction-Assisted Endoscope Sheath to Transfer SMAS for Lip Augmentation.一种使用抽吸辅助内镜鞘转移颞浅筋膜进行唇部填充的技术。
Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Sep 1;37(8):NP90-NP93. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx097.
6
Autologous superficial musculoaponeurotic system graft as implantable filler in nasolabial fold correction.自体表浅肌肉腱膜系统移植作为鼻唇沟矫正的可植入填充材料。
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008 Jul-Aug;10(4):260-6. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.10.4.260.
7
An Approach to Selection of Face-Lift Techniques for Different Types of Faces: An Analysis of 1000 Asian Patients Over 9 Years.针对不同脸型选择面部提升技术的方法:对9年间1000例亚洲患者的分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Aug 1;93(2):153-162. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003982. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
8
Is the SMAS Flap Facelift Safe? A Comparison of Complications Between the Sub-SMAS Approach Versus the Subcutaneous Approach With or Without SMAS Plication in Aesthetic Rhytidectomy at an Academic Institution.SMAS皮瓣面部提升术安全吗?学术机构中美学除皱术中皮下SMAS入路与皮下入路(有无SMAS折叠)并发症的比较。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Dec;39(6):870-6. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0558-9. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
9
Biplanar superficial musculoaponeurotic system imbrication rhytidectomy.双平面表浅肌肉腱膜系统重叠除皱术
Facial Plast Surg. 2014 Aug;30(4):380-93. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1383556. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
10
SMAS rhytidectomy versus deep plane rhytidectomy: an objective comparison.SMAS除皱术与深层平面除皱术:客观比较
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Sep;102(3):878-81. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199809030-00041.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Increasing Nasal Tip Projection With Lip Position in Primary Rhinoplasty.初次鼻整形术中鼻尖突出度增加与唇部位置的相关性
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Jul 1;19(4):323-326. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2017.0070.
2
A Quantitative Approach to Determining the Ideal Female Lip Aesthetic and Its Effect on Facial Attractiveness.一种确定理想女性唇部美学及其对面部吸引力影响的定量方法。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Jul 1;19(4):261-267. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.2049.