Suppr超能文献

硬膜外镇痛对上腹部大手术后肠功能恢复的影响。

Effect of thoracic epidural analgesia on recovery of bowel function after major upper abdominal surgery.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:247-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.042. Epub 2016 May 13.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) shortens the first gas-out time compared to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (iv-PCA) and promotes earlier discharge after major upper abdominal surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

A tertiary care university hospital.

PATIENTS

Fifty-six patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

TEA (n=28) was performed using a paramedian approach at T6-7 or T7-8. Hydromorphone (8 μg/mL) was added to 0.15% ropivacaine (bolus/lockout time/basal: 3 mL/15 minutes/5 mL). The iv-PCA regimen (n=28) included 20 μg/mL fentanyl (bolus/lockout time/basal: 0.5 mL/15 minutes/0.5 mL). The 2 analgesic methods were maintained for 3 days.

MEASUREMENT

The primary end point was first gas-out time, and the secondary end points were hospital discharge, pain scores, and first voiding time.

MAIN RESULTS

No differences in first gas-out time (TEA, 4.1±1.2 days; iv-PCA, 3.4±1.9 days; P=.15) or hospital stay (TEA, 9.8±2.2 days; iv-PCA, 11.4±5.2 days; P=.19) were observed between the 2 groups. A visual analog pain scale scores during rest and coughing were lower in the TEA than those for iv-PCA even with 40% to 46% less rescue analgesic. However, TEA delayed first voiding time (3.6±0.9 vs 2.8±1.6 days; P=.02) and required more frequent bladder catheterization (46% vs 11%; P=.008) than those of iv-PCA.

CONCLUSION

TEA with a regimen of hydromorphone (8 μg/mL) added to 0.15% ropivacaine did not provide earlier gas-out compared to that of iv-PCA in patients who underwent major upper abdominal surgery.

摘要

研究目的

我们研究了与静脉患者自控镇痛(iv-PCA)相比,胸段硬膜外镇痛(TEA)是否能缩短首次呼气时间,并促进上腹部大手术后的早期出院。

设计

前瞻性观察研究。

设置

三级护理大学医院。

患者

56 例接受上腹部大手术的患者。

干预措施

TEA(n=28)采用 T6-7 或 T7-8 旁正中入路。氢吗啡酮(8μg/mL)加入 0.15%罗哌卡因(推注/锁定时间/基础:3mL/15 分钟/5mL)。iv-PCA 方案(n=28)包括 20μg/mL 芬太尼(推注/锁定时间/基础:0.5mL/15 分钟/0.5mL)。两种镇痛方法均维持 3 天。

测量

主要终点是首次呼气时间,次要终点是出院、疼痛评分和首次排尿时间。

主要结果

两组之间首次呼气时间(TEA,4.1±1.2 天;iv-PCA,3.4±1.9 天;P=.15)或住院时间(TEA,9.8±2.2 天;iv-PCA,11.4±5.2 天;P=.19)均无差异。TEA 组在休息和咳嗽时的视觉模拟疼痛评分低于 iv-PCA 组,即使使用了 40%至 46%的较少补救性镇痛药物。然而,TEA 组首次排尿时间(3.6±0.9 比 2.8±1.6 天;P=.02)延迟,且需要更频繁的导尿(46%比 11%;P=.008)比 iv-PCA 组多。

结论

在接受上腹部大手术的患者中,与 iv-PCA 相比,氢吗啡酮(8μg/mL)加入 0.15%罗哌卡因的 TEA 并不能更早地呼气。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验