Suppr超能文献

开放性胰十二指肠切除术中镇痛效果与功能恢复的比较分析:局部麻醉药伤口浸润、腹横肌平面阻滞和肌肉内电刺激的随机对照试验

Comparative analysis of analgesic efficacy and functional recovery in open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial of local anesthetic wound infiltration, transversus abdominis plane block, and intramuscular electrical stimulation.

作者信息

Kim Hyun-Chang, Park Jinyoung, Kim Hyung Sun, Hong Yeon Hwa, Song Young, Park Joon Seong

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Rehabilitation, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Dec 1;13(6):950-961. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-650. Epub 2024 Jun 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is associated with severe postoperative pain. Optimized pain management can potentially elevate patients' postoperative quality of life. This study focused on comparing the analgesic efficacy and subsequent functional recovery of three techniques, continuous local wound infiltration (LWI), four-quadrant transversus abdominis plane (4QTAP) block, and needle electrical twitch obtaining intramuscular stimulation (NETOIMS), in patients subjected to open PD.

METHODS

This is a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled study. Among a total of 80 eligible patients, 72 were randomized into the LWI, 4QTAP block, or NETOIMS groups for postoperative pain management. The primary outcome measured was the pain score, which was recorded on postoperative days (PODs) 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28. Additionally, consumption of morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and ibuprofen until POD 3 was analyzed. Functional recovery indicators, such as gait speed and peak cough flow (PCF), were assessed on the day before surgery (baseline), and on PODs 2, 7, 14, and 28. A one-way analysis of variance, with subsequent Bonferroni analysis, was used to compare these main outcomes.

RESULTS

Out of the 72 patients, 68 (LWI, 22; 4QTAP, 23; NETOIMS 23) were included in the final analysis. Compared to the LWI group, both the 4QTAP block and NETOIMS group demonstrated significantly lower pain scores from PODs 0 through 7 (P<0.001 for POD 0-5; P=0.001 for POD 7, for both groups). The pain scores in the 4QTAP block and NETOIMS groups were comparable across all recorded time points. Up to POD 3, there was a significant reduction in both MMEs (P<0.001) and ibuprofen consumption (P=0.003) in these groups. Additionally, on POD 2, the 4QTAP block and NETOIMS groups exhibited superior PCF (P<0.001) and faster gait speed (P=0.008) compared to the LWI group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to LWI, both 4QTAP block and NETOIMS were more effective in reducing postoperative pain, necessitated fewer analgesics, and facilitated improved functional recovery after PD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Research Information Service of Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency; cris.nih.go.kr; registration ID: KCT0005814.

摘要

背景

胰十二指肠切除术(PD)术后疼痛剧烈。优化疼痛管理可能会提高患者术后生活质量。本研究聚焦于比较持续局部伤口浸润(LWI)、四象限腹横肌平面(4QTAP)阻滞和针电极诱发肌肉颤搐获取肌内刺激(NETOIMS)这三种技术在接受开放性PD患者中的镇痛效果及随后的功能恢复情况。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、单盲、随机对照研究。在总共80例符合条件的患者中,72例被随机分为LWI组、4QTAP阻滞组或NETOIMS组进行术后疼痛管理。主要观察指标为疼痛评分,于术后第0、1、2、3、5、7、14和28天记录。此外,分析至术后第3天的吗啡毫克当量(MME)和布洛芬消耗量。功能恢复指标,如步态速度和峰值咳嗽流速(PCF),在手术前一天(基线)以及术后第2、7、14和28天进行评估。采用单因素方差分析及随后的Bonferroni分析来比较这些主要观察指标。

结果

72例患者中,68例(LWI组22例;4QTAP阻滞组23例;NETOIMS组23例)纳入最终分析。与LWI组相比,4QTAP阻滞组和NETOIMS组在术后第0至7天的疼痛评分均显著更低(术后第0至5天,两组P<0.001;术后第7天,两组P=0.001)。4QTAP阻滞组和NETOIMS组在所有记录时间点的疼痛评分相当。至术后第3天,这两组的MME(P<0.001)和布洛芬消耗量(P=0.003)均显著减少。此外,在术后第2天,与LWI组相比,4QTAP阻滞组和NETOIMS组的PCF更高(P<0.001),步态速度更快(P=0.008)。

结论

与LWI相比,4QTAP阻滞和NETOIMS在减轻PD术后疼痛方面更有效,所需镇痛药物更少,并有助于改善术后功能恢复。

试验注册

韩国疾病控制与预防机构临床研究信息服务中心;cris.nih.go.kr;注册号:KCT0005814。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68fb/11634415/423c4831e784/hbsn-13-06-950-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验