Suppr超能文献

新鲜周期和玻璃化冷冻复苏周期中单囊胚移植与双囊胚移植的临床结局

Clinical outcomes of single versus double blastocyst transfer in fresh and vitrified-warmed cycles.

作者信息

Eum Jin Hee, Park Jae Kyun, Kim So Young, Paek Soo Kyung, Seok Hyun Ha, Chang Eun Mi, Lee Dong Ryul, Lee Woo Sik

机构信息

Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, College of Medicine, CHA University, Seoul, Korea.

Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, College of Medicine, CHA University, Seoul, Korea.; Department of Biomedical Science, College of Life Science, CHA University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2016 Sep;43(3):164-8. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2016.43.3.164. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Assisted reproductive technology has been associated with an increase in multiple pregnancies. The most effective strategy for reducing multiple pregnancies is single embryo transfer. Beginning in October 2015, the National Supporting Program for Infertility in South Korea has limited the number of embryos that can be transferred per in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle depending on the patient's age. However, little is known regarding the effect of age and number of transferred embryos on the clinical outcomes of Korean patients. Thus, this study was performed to evaluate the effect of the number of transferred blastocysts on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This study was carried out in the Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center from January 2013 to December 2014. The clinical outcomes of 514 women who underwent the transfer of one or two blastocysts on day 5 after IVF and of 721 women who underwent the transfer of one or two vitrified-warmed blastocysts were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

For both fresh and vitrified-warmed cycles, the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth or ongoing pregnancy rate were not significantly different between patients who underwent elective single blastocyst transfer (eSBT) and patients who underwent double blastocyst transfer (DBT), regardless of age. However, the multiple pregnancy rate was significantly lower in the eSBT group than in the DBT group.

CONCLUSION

The clinical outcomes of eSBT and DBT were equivalent, but eSBT had a lower risk of multiple pregnancy and is, therefore, the best option.

摘要

目的

辅助生殖技术与多胎妊娠的增加有关。减少多胎妊娠的最有效策略是单胚胎移植。从2015年10月开始,韩国国家不孕症支持计划根据患者年龄限制了每个体外受精(IVF)周期可移植的胚胎数量。然而,关于年龄和移植胚胎数量对韩国患者临床结局的影响知之甚少。因此,本研究旨在评估移植囊胚数量对临床结局的影响。

方法

本研究于2013年1月至2014年12月在CHA江南医疗中心生育中心进行。回顾性分析了514例IVF后第5天移植1个或2个囊胚的妇女以及721例移植1个或2个玻璃化冷冻复苏囊胚的妇女的临床结局。

结果

对于新鲜周期和玻璃化冷冻复苏周期,无论年龄如何,接受选择性单囊胚移植(eSBT)的患者与接受双囊胚移植(DBT)的患者之间的临床妊娠率和活产或持续妊娠率均无显著差异。然而,eSBT组的多胎妊娠率显著低于DBT组。

结论

eSBT和DBT的临床结局相当,但eSBT的多胎妊娠风险较低,因此是最佳选择。

相似文献

1
Clinical outcomes of single versus double blastocyst transfer in fresh and vitrified-warmed cycles.
Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2016 Sep;43(3):164-8. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2016.43.3.164. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
2
Single-blastocyst transfer decreases twin gestation without affecting pregnancy outcome.
Fertil Steril. 2008 Jun;89(6):1702-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.036. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
3
Elective single blastocyst transfer in advanced maternal age.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 Jun;34(6):741-748. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-0906-6. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
6
Comparable clinical outcomes and live births after single vitrified-warmed and fresh blastocyst transfer.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Nov;25(5):466-73. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Jul 22.
8
Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Aug;102(2):203-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.01.007.
10
Single Blastocyst Transfer: The Key to Reduce Multiple Pregnancy Rates Without Compromising the Live Birth Rate.
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2017 Jul-Sep;10(3):201-207. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_130_16.

引用本文的文献

4
Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo with a good quality embryo benefit poor prognosis patients?
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020 Sep 30;18(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12958-020-00656-2.
5
Which is better for mothers and babies: fresh or frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Sep 23;20(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03248-5.
7
Extended culture of poor-quality supernumerary embryos improves ART outcomes.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Feb;35(2):311-319. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1063-7. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
8
[Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of elective single versus double cleavage-stage embryo transfer].
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2016 Apr 20;37(4):512-516. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2017.04.15.

本文引用的文献

1
In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
Fertil Steril. 2013 Jul;100(1):100-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.056. Epub 2013 Mar 30.
2
Infertility and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hum Reprod. 2013 Jan;28(1):125-37. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des347. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
3
Multiple gestation associated with infertility therapy: an American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee opinion.
Fertil Steril. 2012 Apr;97(4):825-34. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.11.048. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
4
Birth outcomes of intended pregnancies among women who used assisted reproductive technology, ovulation stimulation, or no treatment.
Fertil Steril. 2011 Aug;96(2):314-320.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.073. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
5
The epidemic of multiple gestations and neonatal intensive care unit use: the cost of irresponsibility.
J Pediatr. 2011 Sep;159(3):409-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.02.017. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
6
Frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: clinical outcomes of single and double blastocyst transfers.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011 Jul;28(7):575-81. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9551-7. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
8
Clinical practice. In vitro fertilization.
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 25;356(4):379-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp065743.
9
Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction--the Belgian project.
Hum Reprod Update. 2005 Jan-Feb;11(1):3-14. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmh048. Epub 2004 Nov 4.
10
Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology.
N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 7;346(10):731-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010806.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验