Landoni Giovanni, Pisano Antonio, Lomivorotov Vladimir, Alvaro Gabriele, Hajjar Ludhmila, Paternoster Gianluca, Nigro Neto Caetano, Latronico Nicola, Fominskiy Evgeny, Pasin Laura, Finco Gabriele, Lobreglio Rosetta, Azzolini Maria Luisa, Buscaglia Giuseppe, Castella Alberto, Comis Marco, Conte Adele, Conte Massimiliano, Corradi Francesco, Dal Checco Erika, De Vuono Giovanni, Ganzaroli Marco, Garofalo Eugenio, Gazivoda Gordana, Lembo Rosalba, Marianello Daniele, Baiardo Redaelli Martina, Monaco Fabrizio, Tarzia Valentina, Mucchetti Marta, Belletti Alessandro, Mura Paolo, Musu Mario, Pala Giovanni, Paltenghi Massimiliano, Pasyuga Vadim, Piras Desiderio, Riefolo Claudio, Roasio Agostino, Ruggeri Laura, Santini Francesco, Székely Andrea, Verniero Luigi, Vezzani Antonella, Zangrillo Alberto, Bellomo Rinaldo
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Division of Cardiac Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Apr;31(2):719-730. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.07.017. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
Of the 230 million patients undergoing major surgical procedures every year, more than 1 million will die within 30 days. Thus, any nonsurgical interventions that help reduce perioperative mortality might save thousands of lives. The authors have updated a previous consensus process to identify all the nonsurgical interventions, supported by randomized evidence, that may help reduce perioperative mortality.
A web-based international consensus conference.
The study comprised 500 clinicians from 61 countries.
A systematic literature search was performed to identify published literature about nonsurgical interventions, supported by randomized evidence, showing a statistically significant impact on mortality. A consensus conference of experts discussed eligible papers. The interventions identified by the conference then were submitted to colleagues worldwide through a web-based survey.
The authors identified 11 interventions contributing to increased survival (perioperative hemodynamic optimization, neuraxial anesthesia, noninvasive ventilation, tranexamic acid, selective decontamination of the gastrointestinal tract, insulin for tight glycemic control, preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump, leuko-depleted red blood cells transfusion, levosimendan, volatile agents, and remote ischemic preconditioning) and 2 interventions showing increased mortality (beta-blocker therapy and aprotinin). Interventions then were voted on by participating clinicians. Percentages of agreement among clinicians in different countries differed significantly for 6 interventions, and a variable gap between evidence and clinical practice was noted.
The authors identified 13 nonsurgical interventions that may decrease or increase perioperative mortality, with variable agreement by clinicians. Such interventions may be optimal candidates for investigation in high-quality trials and discussion in international guidelines to reduce perioperative mortality.
每年有2.3亿患者接受大手术,其中超过100万人会在30天内死亡。因此,任何有助于降低围手术期死亡率的非手术干预措施都可能挽救数千人的生命。作者更新了之前的共识流程,以确定所有有随机证据支持的、可能有助于降低围手术期死亡率的非手术干预措施。
基于网络的国际共识会议。
该研究包括来自61个国家的500名临床医生。
进行系统的文献检索,以确定有随机证据支持的、对死亡率有统计学显著影响的关于非手术干预措施的已发表文献。专家共识会议对符合条件的论文进行了讨论。会议确定的干预措施随后通过基于网络的调查提交给全球的同行。
作者确定了11种有助于提高生存率的干预措施(围手术期血流动力学优化、神经轴索麻醉、无创通气、氨甲环酸、胃肠道选择性去污、严格血糖控制用胰岛素、术前主动脉内球囊泵、去白细胞红细胞输血、左西孟旦、挥发性麻醉剂和远程缺血预处理)以及2种显示死亡率增加的干预措施(β受体阻滞剂治疗和抑肽酶)。然后由参与的临床医生对干预措施进行投票。不同国家的临床医生对6种干预措施的同意率差异显著,并且注意到证据与临床实践之间存在可变差距。
作者确定了13种可能降低或增加围手术期死亡率的非手术干预措施,临床医生的同意率各不相同。这些干预措施可能是高质量试验研究和国际指南讨论的最佳候选对象,以降低围手术期死亡率。