Suppr超能文献

从综合医疗保健服务系统角度比较磁控生长棒与传统生长棒治疗美国早发性脊柱侧弯的成本分析

Cost analysis of magnetically controlled growing rods compared with traditional growing rods for early-onset scoliosis in the US: an integrated health care delivery system perspective.

作者信息

Polly David W, Ackerman Stacey J, Schneider Karen, Pawelek Jeff B, Akbarnia Behrooz A

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Covance Market Access Services Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Sep 14;8:457-465. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S113633. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Traditional growing rod (TGR) for early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is effective but requires repeated invasive surgical lengthenings under general anesthesia. Magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) is lengthened noninvasively using a hand-held magnetic external remote controller in a physician office; however, the MCGR implant is expensive, and the cumulative cost savings have not been well studied. We compared direct medical costs of MCGR and TGR for EOS from the US integrated health care delivery system perspective. We hypothesized that over time, the MCGR implant cost will be offset by eliminating repeated TGR surgical lengthenings.

METHODS

For both TGR and MCGR, the economic model estimated the cumulative costs for initial implantation, lengthenings, revisions due to device failure, surgical-site infections, device exchanges (at 3.8 years), and final fusion, over a 6-year episode of care. Model parameters were estimated from published literature, a multicenter EOS database of US institutions, and interviews. Costs were discounted at 3.0% annually and represent 2015 US dollars.

RESULTS

Of 1,000 simulated patients over 6 years, MCGR was associated with an estimated 270 fewer deep surgical-site infections and 197 fewer revisions due to device failure compared with TGR. MCGR was projected to cost an additional $61 per patient over the 6-year episode of care compared with TGR. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the results were sensitive to changes in the percentage of MCGR dual rod use, months between TGR lengthenings, percentage of hospital inpatient (vs outpatient) TGR lengthenings, and MCGR implant cost.

CONCLUSION

Cost neutrality of MCGR to TGR was achieved over the 6-year episode of care by eliminating repeated TGR surgical lengthenings. To our knowledge, this is the first cost analysis comparing MCGR to TGR - from the US provider perspective - which demonstrates the efficient provision of care with MCGR.

摘要

目的

传统生长棒(TGR)用于早发性脊柱侧弯(EOS)是有效的,但需要在全身麻醉下反复进行侵入性手术延长。磁控生长棒(MCGR)可在医生办公室使用手持式磁性外部遥控器进行非侵入性延长;然而,MCGR植入物价格昂贵,且累计成本节约情况尚未得到充分研究。我们从美国综合医疗保健服务系统的角度比较了MCGR和TGR治疗EOS的直接医疗成本。我们假设随着时间的推移,MCGR植入物的成本将因消除TGR的反复手术延长而得到抵消。

方法

对于TGR和MCGR,经济模型估计了在6年的护理期间,初始植入、延长、因器械故障进行的翻修、手术部位感染、器械更换(在3.8年时)以及最终融合的累计成本。模型参数来自已发表的文献、美国机构的多中心EOS数据库以及访谈。成本按每年3.0%进行贴现,以2015年美元表示。

结果

在6年中对1000名模拟患者进行分析,与TGR相比,MCGR估计可减少270例深部手术部位感染,因器械故障进行的翻修减少197例。与TGR相比,MCGR预计在6年的护理期间每位患者的成本将额外增加61美元。敏感性分析表明,结果对MCGR双棒使用百分比、TGR延长之间的月数、TGR延长住院(与门诊)百分比以及MCGR植入物成本的变化敏感。

结论

通过消除TGR的反复手术延长,在6年的护理期间MCGR与TGR实现了成本持平。据我们所知,这是首次从美国医疗服务提供者的角度对MCGR和TGR进行成本分析,证明了MCGR提供护理的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bd2/5028096/0d1f632c67ac/ceor-8-457Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验