Kohl Kevin D, Ciminari M Eugenia, Chediack Juan G, Leafloor James O, Karasov William H, McWilliams Scott R, Caviedes-Vidal Enrique
Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, 465 21st Ave South, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Instituto Multidisciplinario de Investigaciones Biológicas de San Luis, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, Chacabuco 917, San Luis, 5700, Argentina.
J Comp Physiol B. 2017 Feb;187(2):339-351. doi: 10.1007/s00360-016-1037-6. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
In nature, birds are faced with variable food sources that may differ in composition (protein vs. carbohydrates) and quality (highly digestible material vs. indigestible fiber). Studies in passerine birds and some commercial poultry demonstrate that the gastrointestinal tract can respond to varying diet composition and quality by changing morphology and/or activities of digestive enzymes. However, studies in additional avian species are warranted to understand generalities of these trends. We first fed juvenile mallards (Anas platyrhynchos), chickens (Gallus gallus), and quails (Coturnix coturnix) on either high-carbohydrate or high-protein diets. For the most part, birds fed the high-carbohydrate diet had higher small intestinal and cecal disaccharidase activities (maltase and sucrase). However, only mallards exhibited higher small intestinal aminopeptidase-N (APN) activities when fed the high-protein diet. These results differ from passerine birds, which largely modulate small intestinal proteases, but not disaccharidases. In another trial, we fed Canada geese (Branta canadensis) diets that varied in both their protein and fiber concentrations for approximately 3.5 months. Birds fed the high-fiber diets had significantly longer small intestines and caeca compared to those fed low-fiber diets. Additionally, geese fed the high-fiber diets exhibited lower mass-specific activities of small intestinal sucrase, and higher activities of APN when summed across the small intestine and ceca. Similar to the avian species above, geese fed the high-protein diets did not exhibit flexibility in their small intestinal APN activities. Overall, these experiments demonstrate that responsiveness of the avian digestive tract to diet composition may have phylogenetic or ecological constraints. Studies on other avian taxa are needed to understand these patterns.
在自然界中,鸟类面临着成分(蛋白质与碳水化合物)和质量(高消化性物质与难消化纤维)各异的食物来源。对雀形目鸟类和一些商业家禽的研究表明,胃肠道能够通过改变消化酶的形态和/或活性来应对不同的饮食成分和质量。然而,有必要对更多鸟类物种进行研究,以了解这些趋势的普遍性。我们首先用高碳水化合物或高蛋白饲料喂养绿头鸭幼雏(绿头鸭)、鸡(原鸡)和鹌鹑(日本鹌鹑)。在大多数情况下,喂食高碳水化合物饲料的鸟类小肠和盲肠双糖酶(麦芽糖酶和蔗糖酶)活性较高。然而,只有绿头鸭在喂食高蛋白饲料时小肠氨肽酶 - N(APN)活性较高。这些结果与雀形目鸟类不同,雀形目鸟类主要调节小肠蛋白酶,而非双糖酶。在另一项试验中,我们用蛋白质和纤维浓度不同的饲料喂养加拿大鹅(加拿大黑雁)约3.5个月。与喂食低纤维饲料的鹅相比,喂食高纤维饲料的鹅小肠和盲肠明显更长。此外,喂食高纤维饲料的鹅小肠蔗糖酶的质量比活性较低,而小肠和盲肠的APN活性较高。与上述鸟类物种类似,喂食高蛋白饲料的鹅小肠APN活性没有表现出灵活性。总体而言,这些实验表明鸟类消化道对饮食成分的反应可能存在系统发育或生态限制。需要对其他鸟类分类群进行研究以了解这些模式。