Paiva Bruno, García-Sanz Ramón, San Miguel Jesús F
Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Clinica Universidad de Navarra, IDISNA, Pamplona, Spain.
Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Centro de Investigación Del Cancer (IBMCC-USAL, CSIC), Instituto de Investigaion Biomedica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Cancer Treat Res. 2016;169:103-122. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-40320-5_7.
Assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) is becoming standard diagnostic care for potentially curable neoplasms such as some acute leukemias as well as chronic myeloid and lymphocytic leukemia. Although multiple myeloma (MM) remains as an incurable disease, around half of the patients achieve complete remission (CR), and recent data suggests increasing rates of curability with "total-therapy-like" programs. This landscape is likely to be improved with the advent of new antibodies and small molecules. Therefore, conventional serological and morphological techniques have become suboptimal for sensitive evaluation of highly effective treatment strategies. Although, existing data suggests that MRD could be used as a biomarker to evaluate treatment efficacy, help on therapeutic decisions, and act as surrogate for overall survival, the role of MRD in MM is still a matter of extensive debate. Here, we review the different levels of remission used to define depth of response in MM and their clinical significance, as well as the prognostic value and unique characteristics of MRD detection using immunophenotypic, molecular, and imaging techniques. Key facts The higher efficacy of new treatment strategies for MM demand the incorporation of highly sensitive techniques to monitor treatment efficacy MRD could be used as a more potent surrogate biomarker for survival than standard CR We need to understand the pros and cons of the different MRD techniques The time has come to incorporate highly sensitive, cost-effective, readily available, and standardized MRD techniques into clinical trials to assess its role in therapeutic decisions.
微小残留病(MRD)评估正成为某些急性白血病、慢性髓性白血病和淋巴细胞白血病等潜在可治愈肿瘤的标准诊断手段。尽管多发性骨髓瘤(MM)仍是一种无法治愈的疾病,但约半数患者可实现完全缓解(CR),且近期数据表明,采用“类似全程治疗”方案时治愈率在不断提高。随着新抗体和小分子药物的出现,这种情况可能会得到改善。因此,传统的血清学和形态学技术已不足以用于高效治疗策略的敏感评估。尽管现有数据表明MRD可作为评估治疗疗效的生物标志物,辅助治疗决策,并作为总生存期的替代指标,但MRD在MM中的作用仍存在广泛争议。在此,我们综述了用于定义MM缓解深度的不同缓解水平及其临床意义,以及使用免疫表型、分子和成像技术检测MRD的预后价值和独特特征。关键事实:MM新治疗策略的更高疗效要求采用高灵敏度技术来监测治疗效果;与标准CR相比,MRD可作为更有效的生存替代生物标志物;我们需要了解不同MRD技术的优缺点;现在是时候将高灵敏度、性价比高、易于获得且标准化的MRD技术纳入临床试验,以评估其在治疗决策中的作用了。