Fulciniti Mariateresa, Munshi Nikhil C, Martinez-Lopez Joaquin
Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of hematology, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Unidad CRIS, CNIO, University of Madrid, Spain.
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:832049. doi: 10.1155/2015/832049. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
Novel and more effective treatment strategies against multiple myeloma (MM) have significantly prolonged patients' survival and raised interest in the depth of response and its association with clinical outcome. Minimal residual disease (MRD) has emerged as one of the most relevant prognostic factors in MM and should be included in a new definition of complete response (CR). Although further standardization is still required, MRD monitoring should be applied in prospective clinical trials as a sensitive tool to compare and evaluate the efficacy of different treatment strategies, particularly in the consolidation and maintenance settings, and implement individualized therapy-monitoring approaches. Here, we review current definition of deep response in MM, advantages and limitations of current MRD assessment assays, clinical evidences for MRD monitoring as a prognostic tool for therapeutic decisions in MM, and challenges to develop uniform criteria for MRD monitoring.
针对多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的新型且更有效的治疗策略显著延长了患者的生存期,并引发了人们对缓解深度及其与临床结局关联的兴趣。微小残留病(MRD)已成为MM中最相关的预后因素之一,应纳入完全缓解(CR)的新定义中。尽管仍需要进一步标准化,但MRD监测应在前瞻性临床试验中作为一种敏感工具应用,以比较和评估不同治疗策略的疗效,特别是在巩固和维持治疗阶段,并实施个体化治疗监测方法。在此,我们综述了MM深度缓解的当前定义、当前MRD评估检测方法的优缺点、MRD监测作为MM治疗决策预后工具的临床证据,以及制定统一MRD监测标准所面临的挑战。