Poorten T J, Rosenblum E B
Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Rm. 54 Mulford Hall, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Mol Ecol. 2016 Nov;25(22):5663-5679. doi: 10.1111/mec.13871. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
In the past century, recently emerged infectious diseases have become major drivers of species decline and extinction. The fungal disease chytridiomycosis has devastated many amphibian populations and exacerbated the amphibian conservation crisis. Biologists are beginning to understand what host traits contribute to disease susceptibility, but more work is needed to determine why some species succumb to chytridiomycosis while others do not. We conducted an integrative laboratory experiment to examine how two toad species respond to infection with the pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in a controlled environment. We selected two toad species thought to differ in susceptibility - Bufo marinus (an invasive and putatively resistant species) and Bufo boreas (an endangered and putatively susceptible species). We measured infection intensity, body weight, histological changes and genomewide gene expression using a custom assay developed from transcriptome sequencing. Our results confirmed that the two species differ in susceptibility with the more susceptible species, B. boreas, showing higher infection intensities, loss in body weight, more dramatic histological changes and larger perturbations in gene expression. We found key differences in skin expression responses in multiple pathways including upregulation of skin integrity-related genes in the resistant B. marinus. Together, our results show intrinsic differences in host response between related species, which are likely to be important in explaining variation in response to a deadly emerging pathogen in wild populations. Our study also underscores the importance of understanding differences among host species to better predict disease outcomes and reveal generalities about host response to emerging infectious diseases of wildlife.
在过去的一个世纪里,新出现的传染病已成为物种衰退和灭绝的主要驱动因素。真菌疾病壶菌病已经摧毁了许多两栖动物种群,并加剧了两栖动物保护危机。生物学家开始了解哪些宿主特征会导致易感性,但仍需要更多的研究来确定为什么有些物种会死于壶菌病,而有些则不会。我们进行了一项综合实验室实验,以研究两种蟾蜍在受控环境中对病原体蛙壶菌感染的反应。我们选择了两种被认为易感性不同的蟾蜍物种——海蟾蜍(一种入侵物种且据推测具有抗性)和北美蟾蜍(一种濒危物种且据推测易感)。我们使用从转录组测序开发的定制检测方法,测量了感染强度、体重、组织学变化和全基因组基因表达。我们的结果证实,这两个物种在易感性上存在差异,更易感的北美蟾蜍表现出更高的感染强度、体重减轻、更显著的组织学变化和更大的基因表达扰动。我们发现多个途径的皮肤表达反应存在关键差异,包括抗性海蟾蜍中与皮肤完整性相关基因的上调。总之,我们的结果表明相关物种之间宿主反应存在内在差异,这可能对解释野生种群对致命新出现病原体的反应差异很重要。我们的研究还强调了了解宿主物种之间差异对于更好地预测疾病结果和揭示宿主对野生动物新出现传染病反应的一般性的重要性。