Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Clin Nutr. 2017 Dec;36(6):1701-1706. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Lean body mass (LBM), quantified using computed tomography (CT), is a significant predictor of clinical outcomes in the critically ill. While CT analysis is precise and accurate in measuring body composition, it may not be practical or readily accessible to all patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Here, we assessed the agreement between LBM measured by CT and four previously developed equations that predict LBM using variables (i.e. age, sex, weight, height) commonly recorded in the ICU.
LBM was calculated in 327 critically ill adults using CT scans, taken at ICU admission, and 4 predictive equations (E1-4) that were derived from non-critically adults since there are no ICU-specific equations. Agreement was assessed using paired t-tests, Pearson's correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots.
Median LBM calculated by CT was 45 kg (IQR 37-53 kg) and was significantly different (p < 0.001) from E1 (52.5 kg; IQR: 42-61 kg), E2 (55 kg; IQR 45-64 kg), E3 (55 kg; IQR 44-64 kg), and E4 (54 kg; IQR 49-61 kg). Pearson correlation coefficients suggested moderate correlation (r = 0.739, 0.756, 0.732, and 0.680, p < 0.001, respectively). Each of the equations overestimated LBM (error ranged from 7.5 to 9.9 kg), compared with LBM calculated by CT, suggesting insufficient agreement.
Our data indicates a large bias is present between the calculation of LBM by CT imaging and the predictive equations that have been compared here. This underscores the need for future research toward the development of ICU-specific equations that reliably estimate LBM in a practical and cost-effective manner.
通过计算机断层扫描(CT)量化的瘦体重(LBM)是重症患者临床结局的重要预测指标。虽然 CT 分析在测量身体成分方面精确且准确,但对于 ICU 中的所有患者来说,它可能并不实用或难以获得。在这里,我们评估了通过 CT 测量的 LBM 与之前开发的四种使用 ICU 中常见的变量(即年龄、性别、体重、身高)预测 LBM 的方程之间的一致性。
使用 ICU 入院时的 CT 扫描计算了 327 名重症成人的 LBM,并使用 4 种预测方程(E1-4)进行了计算,这些方程是从非重症成人中推导出来的,因为没有 ICU 特异性方程。使用配对 t 检验、Pearson 相关系数和 Bland-Altman 图评估了一致性。
通过 CT 计算得出的 LBM 的中位数为 45kg(IQR 37-53kg),与 E1(52.5kg;IQR:42-61kg)、E2(55kg;IQR 45-64kg)、E3(55kg;IQR 44-64kg)和 E4(54kg;IQR 49-61kg)均有显著差异(p<0.001)。Pearson 相关系数表明存在中度相关性(r=0.739、0.756、0.732 和 0.680,p<0.001,分别)。与 CT 计算的 LBM 相比,每种方程都高估了 LBM(误差范围为 7.5 至 9.9kg),表明一致性不足。
我们的数据表明,通过 CT 成像计算的 LBM 与这里比较的预测方程之间存在较大的偏差。这突显了需要进行未来的研究,以开发出实用且具有成本效益的 ICU 特异性方程,以便可靠地估计 LBM。