Fardin Vinicius P, de Paula Vitor Guarconi, Bonfante Estevam A, Coelho Paulo G, Bonfante Gerson
Department of Prosthodontics, University of São Paulo-Bauru College of Dentistry, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Department of Prosthodontics, University of São Paulo-Bauru College of Dentistry, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Dent Mater. 2016 Dec;32(12):1543-1554. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
To evaluate the fatigue life of zirconia-veneered and metal-ceramic crowns comprised by an even thickness or a modified framework design when loaded on marginal ridges.
Eighty marginal ridges were present after fabrication of forty molar crowns cemented onto composite-resin replicas and divided (n=20/each), in the following groups: metal-ceramic with even thickness (MCev) or with a modified framework design (MCm, lingual collar with proximal struts); porcelain-fused to zirconia with even thickness (PFZev) or with the modified framework design (PFZm). Each marginal ridge (mesial and distal) was subjected to cyclic loading separately with a lithium disilicate indenter for 10 cycles or until fracture. Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon matched pair test (p<0.05) evaluated both marginal ridges. Every 125,000 cycles, the test was interrupted for damage inspection. Weibull distribution (90% confidence bounds) determined the probability of survival (reliability).
Weibull 2-parameter contour-plot showed significantly higher fatigue life for PFZev compared to MC, and comparable with PFZm. A significant decrease in reliability was observed between groups from 625,000 until 10 cycles. Metal-ceramic groups presented significantly lower probability of survival at 10 cycles (MCev=0.66% and MCm=4.73%) compared to PFZm (23.41%) and PFZev (36.68%). Fractographic marks showed a consistent fracture origin and direction of crack propagation. Reliability was higher for porcelain-fused to zirconia than for metal ceramic crowns, regardless of framework design.
Zirconia-veneered crowns presented decreased fracture rates compared to metal ceramics, even when loaded at marginal ridges, regardless of framework design.
评估在边缘嵴加载时,由均匀厚度或改良框架设计组成的氧化锆贴面冠和金属烤瓷冠的疲劳寿命。
在将40颗磨牙冠粘结到复合树脂复制体上后,出现80个边缘嵴,并分为以下几组(每组n = 20):均匀厚度的金属烤瓷冠(MCev)或改良框架设计的金属烤瓷冠(MCm,带有近中支柱的舌侧颈环);均匀厚度的氧化锆烤瓷冠(PFZev)或改良框架设计的氧化锆烤瓷冠(PFZm)。每个边缘嵴(近中和远中)分别用二硅酸锂压头进行10次循环的循环加载,或直至断裂。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Wilcoxon配对检验(p<0.05)对两个边缘嵴进行评估。每125,000次循环后,中断试验进行损伤检查。威布尔分布(90%置信区间)确定存活概率(可靠性)。
威布尔双参数等高线图显示,PFZev的疲劳寿命明显高于MC,且与PFZm相当。在625,000次循环至10次循环之间,各组之间的可靠性显著降低。与PFZm(23.41%)和PFZev(36.68%)相比,金属烤瓷冠组在10次循环时的存活概率显著较低(MCev = 0.66%,MCm = 4.73%)。断口分析标记显示了一致的断裂起源和裂纹扩展方向。无论框架设计如何,氧化锆烤瓷冠的可靠性均高于金属烤瓷冠。
即使在边缘嵴加载,无论框架设计如何,氧化锆贴面冠的骨折率均低于金属烤瓷冠。