Campbell Morag Allan
University of St Andrews, UK.
Hist Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;28(1):44-57. doi: 10.1177/0957154X16671262. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
Puerperal insanity has been described as a nineteenth-century diagnosis, entrenched in contemporary expectations of proper womanly behaviour. Drawing on detailed study of establishment registers and patient case notes, this paper examines the puerperal insanity diagnosis at Dundee Lunatic Asylum between 1820 and 1860. In particular, the study aims to consider whether the class or social status of the patients had a bearing on how their conditions were perceived and rationalized, and how far the puerperal insanity diagnosis, coloured by the values assigned to it by the medical officers, may have been reserved for some women and not for others. This examination of the diagnosis in a Scottish community, suggesting a contrast in the way that middle-class and working-class women were diagnosed at Dundee, engages with and expands on work on puerperal insanity elsewhere.
产褥期精神病曾被描述为一种19世纪的诊断,深深植根于当时对女性得体行为的期望之中。本文通过对收容所登记册和患者病历的详细研究,考察了1820年至1860年间邓迪疯人院的产褥期精神病诊断情况。具体而言,该研究旨在探讨患者的阶级或社会地位是否会影响对其病情的认知及解释方式,以及在医务官员赋予其特定价值观的影响下,产褥期精神病诊断在多大程度上可能只针对某些女性而非其他女性。对苏格兰一个社区的这一诊断情况进行考察,结果表明邓迪对中产阶级和工人阶级女性的诊断方式存在差异,这与其他地方关于产褥期精神病的研究相关且有所拓展。