• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在地理倾斜估计中,个体差异和衰老效应反映的是认知效应还是感知效应?

Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects?

作者信息

Dean Abigail M, Oh Jaehyun, Thomson Christopher J, Norris Catherine J, Durgin Frank H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, PA, USA.

出版信息

Iperception. 2016 Jul 18;7(4):2041669516658665. doi: 10.1177/2041669516658665. eCollection 2016 Jul-Aug.

DOI:10.1177/2041669516658665
PMID:27698978
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5030756/
Abstract

Several individual differences including age have been suggested to affect the perception of slant. A cross-sectional study of outdoor hill estimation ( = 106) was analyzed using individual difference measures of age, experiential knowledge, fitness, personality traits, and sex. Of particular note, it was found that for participants who reported any experiential knowledge about slant, estimates decreased (i.e., became more accurate) as conscientiousness increased, suggesting that more conscientious individuals were more deliberate about taking their experiential knowledge (rather than perception) into account. Effects of fitness were limited to those without experiential knowledge, suggesting that they, too, may be cognitive rather than perceptual. The observed effects of age, which tended to produce lower, more accurate estimates of hill slant, provide more evidence that older adults do not see hills as steeper. The main effect of age was to lower slant estimates; such effects may be due to implicit experiential knowledge acquired over a lifetime. The results indicate the impact of cognitive, rather than perceptual factors on individual differences in slant estimation.

摘要

包括年龄在内的一些个体差异被认为会影响倾斜度感知。一项针对户外山丘坡度估计的横断面研究(n = 106),使用年龄、经验知识、健康状况、人格特质和性别的个体差异测量方法进行了分析。特别值得注意的是,研究发现,对于那些报告有任何关于倾斜度经验知识的参与者,随着尽责性的增加,估计值会降低(即变得更准确),这表明更尽责的个体在考虑他们的经验知识(而非感知)时更加慎重。健康状况的影响仅限于那些没有经验知识的人,这表明这些影响也可能是认知性的而非感知性的。观察到的年龄效应倾向于产生更低、更准确的山丘坡度估计值,这进一步证明老年人不会把山丘看得更陡峭。年龄的主要影响是降低坡度估计值;这种影响可能是由于一生积累的隐性经验知识所致。结果表明认知因素而非感知因素对倾斜度估计中的个体差异有影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/8624dfa5ed26/10.1177_2041669516658665-img5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/7beb0744491d/10.1177_2041669516658665-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/eb84c018c0c5/10.1177_2041669516658665-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/7037b9c42247/10.1177_2041669516658665-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/ccf97ea5984b/10.1177_2041669516658665-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/565ae05e6885/10.1177_2041669516658665-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/8a8f1a664bde/10.1177_2041669516658665-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/7efe31166ef0/10.1177_2041669516658665-img1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/a06a20c2263e/10.1177_2041669516658665-img2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/f19fa77d8c3d/10.1177_2041669516658665-img3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/3edd8e5ba028/10.1177_2041669516658665-img4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/8624dfa5ed26/10.1177_2041669516658665-img5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/7beb0744491d/10.1177_2041669516658665-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/eb84c018c0c5/10.1177_2041669516658665-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/7037b9c42247/10.1177_2041669516658665-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/ccf97ea5984b/10.1177_2041669516658665-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/565ae05e6885/10.1177_2041669516658665-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/8a8f1a664bde/10.1177_2041669516658665-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/7efe31166ef0/10.1177_2041669516658665-img1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/a06a20c2263e/10.1177_2041669516658665-img2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/f19fa77d8c3d/10.1177_2041669516658665-img3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/3edd8e5ba028/10.1177_2041669516658665-img4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a0/5030756/8624dfa5ed26/10.1177_2041669516658665-img5.jpg

相似文献

1
Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects?在地理倾斜估计中,个体差异和衰老效应反映的是认知效应还是感知效应?
Iperception. 2016 Jul 18;7(4):2041669516658665. doi: 10.1177/2041669516658665. eCollection 2016 Jul-Aug.
2
Skating down a steeper slope: fear influences the perception of geographical slant.在更陡峭的斜坡上滑行:恐惧影响对地理倾斜度的感知。
Perception. 2008;37(2):321-3. doi: 10.1068/p5796.
3
Slant perception for stairs and screens: effects of sex and fatigue in a laboratory environment.楼梯和屏幕的倾斜感知:实验室环境中性别和疲劳的影响
Perception. 2013;42(4):459-69. doi: 10.1068/p7425.
4
The accuracy of 'haptically' measured geographical slant perception.“触觉式”测量的地理倾斜感知的准确性。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Oct;144(2):444-50. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.03.009. Epub 2013 May 22.
5
Perceiving virtual geographical slant: action influences perception.感知虚拟地理倾斜:行动影响感知。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Oct;30(5):811-821. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.5.811.
6
Does perceived angular declination contribute to perceived optical slant on level ground?感知到的角度偏斜是否会导致在水平地面上感知到的视觉倾斜?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Aug;80(6):1609-1618. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1536-5.
7
Palm board and verbal estimates of slant reflect the same perceptual representation.手掌板和倾斜度的口头估计反映了相同的感知表征。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Feb;78(2):663-73. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-1029-8.
8
Manual anchoring biases in slant estimation affect matches even for near surfaces.在倾斜估计中,手动锚定偏差即使对于近表面也会影响匹配。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1665-70. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0770-7.
9
An effect of mood on the perception of geographical slant.心境对地理倾斜感知的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2011 Jan;25(1):174-82. doi: 10.1080/02699931003738026.
10
Perceptual biases and cue weighting in perception of 3D slant from texture and stereo information.基于纹理和立体信息对三维倾斜感知中的知觉偏差和线索加权
J Vis. 2015 Feb 10;15(2):14. doi: 10.1167/15.2.14.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing visuospatial perception in clinical and healthy populations: Test-retest reliability and smallest real difference of hill steepness estimation and the distance-on-hill task in virtual reality.评估临床人群和健康人群的视觉空间感知:虚拟现实中坡度估计和山上距离任务的重测信度及最小真实差异
Psychol Res. 2025 May 20;89(3):101. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02125-0.
2
Does who I am and what I feel determine what I see (or say)? A meta-analytic systematic review exploring the influence of real and perceived bodily state on spatial perception of the external environment.我是谁以及我的感受是否决定了我看到的(或说的)内容?一项元分析系统综述,探索真实和感知身体状态对外部环境空间感知的影响。
PeerJ. 2022 May 23;10:e13383. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13383. eCollection 2022.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Manual anchoring biases in slant estimation affect matches even for near surfaces.在倾斜估计中,手动锚定偏差即使对于近表面也会影响匹配。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1665-70. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0770-7.
2
Sex differences and errors in the use of terrain slope for navigation.性别差异与利用地形坡度进行导航时的误差
Cogn Process. 2015 Sep;16 Suppl 1:323-6. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0669-x.
3
Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for "top-down" effects.认知不会影响感知:评估“自上而下”效应的证据。
Action ability modulates time-to-collision judgments.行动能力会调节对碰撞时间的判断。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Sep;235(9):2729-2739. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5008-2. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
4
Counterpoint.对位法
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Mar;12(2):344-346. doi: 10.1177/1745691616677829.
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e229. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15000965. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
4
How "Paternalistic" Is Spatial Perception? Why Wearing a Heavy Backpack Doesn't-and Couldn't-Make Hills Look Steeper.空间感知有多“家长式”?为何背重背包不会且不可能让山坡看起来更陡峭。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul;8(4):455-73. doi: 10.1177/1745691613489835.
5
Aging and the visual perception of exocentric distance.衰老与对心外距离的视觉感知
Vision Res. 2015 Apr;109(Pt A):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
6
Angular scale expansion theory and the misperception of egocentric distance in locomotor space.角尺度扩展理论与运动空间中自我中心距离的误判
Psychol Neurosci. 2014;7(3):253-260. doi: 10.3922/j.psns.2014.032.
7
Where is uphill? Exploring sex differences when reorienting on a sloped environment presented through 2-D images.上坡在哪里?通过二维图像呈现倾斜环境时重新定向过程中的性别差异探究。
Perception. 2014;43(4):249-64. doi: 10.1068/p7622.
8
Anchoring in action: manual estimates of slant are powerfully biased toward initial hand orientation and are correlated with verbal report.实际中的锚定效应:对手势倾斜度的手动估计强烈偏向于初始手部方位,并且与言语报告相关。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Jun;40(3):1203-12. doi: 10.1037/a0036217. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
9
Egocentric reference frame bias in the palmar haptic perception of surface orientation.手掌触觉对表面方向感知中的自我中心参照系偏差
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Aug;21(4):955-60. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0552-7.
10
Perceiving geographical slant.感知地理倾斜。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Dec;2(4):409-28. doi: 10.3758/BF03210980.