Suppr超能文献

按照当前建议治疗时成人埃布斯坦畸形的自然病程。

Natural Course of Adult Ebstein Anomaly When Treated according to Current Recommendation.

作者信息

Kim Hyung Yoon, Jang Shin Yi, Moon Ju Ryoung, Kim Eun Kyoung, Chang Sung A, Song Jinyoung, Huh June, Kang I Seok, Yang Ji Hyuk, Jun Tae Gook, Park Seung Woo

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Nov;31(11):1749-1754. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.11.1749.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to assess the clinical outcomes of adults with Ebstein Anomaly (EA) according to their treatment modalities. All adult EA patients diagnosed between October 1994 and October 2014 were retrospectively evaluated by medical record review. Total 60 patients were categorized into 3 groups according to their treatment strategy, i.e. non-operative treatment (Group I, n = 23), immediate operative treatment (Group II, n = 27), and delayed operative treatment (Group III, n = 10). A composite of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and factors associated with MACCE were assessed in each treatment group. MACCE occurred in 13.0% patients in Group I, 55.6% patients in Group II and 50% in Group III (P = 0.006). Event free survivals at 5 years were 90% in Group I, 52.7% in Group II, 50.0% in Group III (P = 0.036). Post-operatively, most patients showed improvement on clinical symptoms. However, event free survival rate was lower in patients with operation compared to those with non-operative treatment (58.7% vs. 90.9%; P = 0.007). Major arrhythmic event occurred more frequently even after surgical ablation (50.0% vs. 20.0%; P = 0.034). Re-operation was more frequent in patients underwent delayed surgery compared to those with immediate surgery (50.0% vs. 18.5%; P = 0.001). Current guideline to decide patient's treatment strategy appeared to be appropriate in adult patients with EA. However, surgical ablation for arrhythmia was not enough so that concomitant medical treatment should be considered. Therefore, attentive risk stratification and cautious decision of treatment strategy by experienced cardiac surgeon are believed to improve clinical outcome.

摘要

本研究的目的是根据治疗方式评估成人埃布斯坦畸形(EA)患者的临床结局。通过病历回顾对1994年10月至2014年10月期间诊断的所有成年EA患者进行回顾性评估。根据治疗策略,将60例患者分为3组,即非手术治疗(I组,n = 23)、即刻手术治疗(II组,n = 27)和延迟手术治疗(III组,n = 10)。评估每个治疗组中主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)的综合情况以及与MACCE相关的因素。I组13.0%的患者发生MACCE,II组为55.6%,III组为50%(P = 0.006)。I组5年无事件生存率为90%,II组为52.7%,III组为50.0%(P = 0.036)。术后,大多数患者临床症状有所改善。然而,手术患者的无事件生存率低于非手术治疗患者(58.7%对90.9%;P = 0.007)。即使在手术消融后,主要心律失常事件的发生频率也更高(50.0%对20.0%;P = 0.034)。与即刻手术患者相比,延迟手术患者再次手术的频率更高(50.0%对18.5%;P = 0.001)。目前用于决定患者治疗策略的指南似乎适用于成年EA患者。然而,心律失常的手术消融并不充分,因此应考虑联合药物治疗。因此,经验丰富的心脏外科医生进行细致的风险分层和谨慎的治疗策略决策有望改善临床结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad06/5056206/6395c31159eb/jkms-31-1749-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验