Suppr超能文献

确定积极的跨专业学习伙伴关系的关键领域:一次促进性对话。

Identifying key areas for active interprofessional learning partnerships: A facilitated dialogue.

作者信息

Steven Kathryn, Angus Allyson, Breckenridge Jenna, Davey Peter, Tully Vicki, Muir Fiona

机构信息

a University of Dundee Medical School , Dundee , Scotland , UK.

b NHS Tayside , Dundee , Scotland , UK.

出版信息

J Interprof Care. 2016 Nov;30(6):826-828. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1218829. Epub 2016 Oct 6.

Abstract

Student and service user involvement is recognised as an important factor in creating interprofessional education (IPE) opportunities. We used a team-based learning approach to bring together undergraduate health professional students, early career professionals (ECPs), public partners, volunteers, and carers to explore learning partnerships. Influenced by evaluative inquiry, this qualitative study used a free text response to allow participants to give their own opinion. A total of 153 participants (50 public partners and 103 students and professionals representing 11 healthcare professions) took part. Participants were divided into mixed groups of six (n = 25) and asked to identify areas where students, professionals, and public could work together to improve health professional education. Each group documented their discussions by summarising agreed areas and next steps. Responses were collected and transcribed for inductive content analysis. Seven key themes (areas for joint working) were identified: communication, public as partners, standards of conduct, IPE, quality improvement, education, and learning environments. The team-based learning format enabled undergraduate and postgraduate health professionals to achieve consensus with public partners on areas for IPE and collaboration. Some of our results may be context-specific but the approach is generalisable to other areas.

摘要

学生和服务使用者的参与被视为创造跨专业教育(IPE)机会的一个重要因素。我们采用基于团队的学习方法,将本科健康专业学生、早期职业专业人员(ECP)、公共合作伙伴、志愿者和护理人员聚集在一起,以探索学习伙伴关系。受评价性探究的影响,这项定性研究采用自由文本回复的方式,让参与者发表自己的意见。共有153名参与者(50名公共合作伙伴以及代表11个医疗保健专业的103名学生和专业人员)参与其中。参与者被分成每组六人(n = 25)的混合小组,并被要求确定学生、专业人员和公众可以共同努力改善健康专业教育的领域。每个小组通过总结达成共识的领域和后续步骤来记录他们的讨论。收集并转录回复内容以进行归纳性内容分析。确定了七个关键主题(联合工作领域):沟通、公众作为合作伙伴、行为标准、跨专业教育、质量改进、教育和学习环境。基于团队的学习形式使本科和研究生健康专业人员能够就跨专业教育和合作领域与公共合作伙伴达成共识。我们的一些结果可能具有特定背景,但该方法可推广到其他领域。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验