Fujitani Yoshio, Fujimoto Shimpei, Takahashi Kiyohito, Satoh Hiroaki, Hirose Takahisa, Hiyoshi Toru, Ai Masumi, Okada Yosuke, Gosho Masahiko, Mita Tomoya, Watada Hirotaka
Department of Metabolism & Endocrinology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Center for Therapeutic Innovations in Diabetes, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nephrology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku-shi, Kochi, Japan.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016 Nov;121:146-156. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
To compare the efficacy on glycemic parameters between a 12-week administration of once-daily linagliptin and thrice-daily voglibose in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.
In a multi-center, randomized, parallel-group study, 382 patients with diabetes were randomized to the linagliptin group (n=192) or the voglibose group (n=190). A meal tolerance test was performed at weeks 0 and 12. Primary outcomes were the change from baseline to week 12 in serum glucose levels at 2h during the meal tolerance test, HbA1c levels, and serum fasting glucose levels, which were compared between the 2 groups.
Whereas changes in serum glucose levels at 2h during the meal tolerance test did not differ between the groups, the mean change in HbA1c levels from baseline to week 12 in the linagliptin group (-0.5±0.5% [-5.1±5.4mmol/mol]) was significantly larger than in the voglibose group (-0.2±0.5% [-2.7±5.4mmol/mol]). In addition, there was significant difference in changes in serum fasting glucose levels (-0.51±0.95mmol/L in the linagliptin group vs. -0.18±0.92mmol/L in the voglibose group, P<0.001). The incidences of hypoglycemia, serious adverse events (AEs), and discontinuations due to AEs were low and similar in both groups. However, gastrointestinal AEs were significantly lower in the linagliptin group (1.05% vs. 5.85%; P=0.01).
These data suggested that linagliptin monotherapy had a stronger glucose-lowering effect than voglibose monotherapy with respect to HbA1c and serum fasting glucose levels, but not serum glucose levels 2h after the start of the meal tolerance test.
比较在日本2型糖尿病患者中,每日一次利格列汀治疗12周与每日三次伏格列波糖治疗对血糖参数的疗效。
在一项多中心、随机、平行组研究中,382例糖尿病患者被随机分为利格列汀组(n = 192)或伏格列波糖组(n = 190)。在第0周和第12周进行餐耐量试验。主要结局指标为餐耐量试验期间2小时血清葡萄糖水平、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平和血清空腹葡萄糖水平从基线至第12周的变化,并在两组之间进行比较。
餐耐量试验期间两组2小时血清葡萄糖水平变化无差异,但利格列汀组从基线至第12周HbA1c水平的平均变化(-0.5±0.5% [-5.1±5.4mmol/mol])显著大于伏格列波糖组(-0.2±0.5% [-2.7±5.4mmol/mol])。此外,血清空腹葡萄糖水平变化存在显著差异(利格列汀组为-0.51±0.95mmol/L,伏格列波糖组为-0.18±0.92mmol/L,P<0.001)。两组低血糖、严重不良事件(AE)及因AE停药的发生率均较低且相似。然而,利格列汀组胃肠道AE显著更低(1.05%对5.85%;P = 0.01)。
这些数据表明,就HbA1c和血清空腹葡萄糖水平而言,利格列汀单药治疗比伏格列波糖单药治疗具有更强的降糖作用,但在餐耐量试验开始后2小时的血清葡萄糖水平方面并非如此。