Frank Rachel M, Cvetanovich Gregory L, Collins Michael J, Arns Thomas A, Black Austin, Verma Nikhil N, Cole Brian J, Forsythe Brian
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..
Arthroscopy. 2017 Jan;33(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.07.019. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
To analyze the publication rate of poster and podium presentations at Arthroscopy Association of North America (AANA) annual meetings from 2008 to 2012.
An online search using PubMed and Google Scholar for all published manuscripts associated with abstracts presented from 2008 to 2012 AANA annual meetings was performed. Abstracts were classified by presentation type (poster vs podium), and the journal and publication date were recorded for all published abstracts. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and Fisher's exact tests were performed, with P < .05 considered significant.
A total of 1,508 abstracts were submitted to AANA annual meetings from 2008 to 2012, with 976 abstracts accepted for presentation (65% overall acceptance rate). There were 328 podium (22% acceptance rate) and 648 poster (43% acceptance rate) presentations. Of the 976 accepted abstracts, 479 (49%) were published within 3 years in peer-reviewed journals. The overall publication rates for podium and poster presentations were 59% (n = 193) and 44% (n = 286), respectively. Podium presentations were significantly more likely to be published within 3 years compared with poster presentations (P < .0001; odds ratio 1.8095, confidence interval 1.3826-2.3682). There were no differences in time to publication between podium and poster presentations (1.3 ± 1.2 vs 1.1 ± 1.3 years, P = .0633). Over the 5-year study period, the overall abstract acceptance rate (P < .0001) and the rate of abstracts accepted for poster presentation (P < .0001) increased significantly over time, whereas there was no increase in the rate of abstracts accepted for podium presentation (P = .5638). The most common journals of publication were Arthroscopy (n = 157, 32.7%) followed by American Journal of Sports Medicine (n = 93, 19.4%).
The overall publication rate of abstracts presented at AANA annual meetings is 49%, with podium presentations 1.8 times more likely to be published than poster presentations. The overall abstract acceptance rate and the rate of abstracts accepted for poster presentation increased significantly over time, whereas there was no significant increase in the rate of abstracts accepted for podium presentation.
The publication rates of abstracts presented at the AANA annual meetings demonstrate the meetings' impact and importance to the advancement of the scientific literature.
分析2008年至2012年北美关节镜协会（AANA）年会的壁报展示和大会发言的发表率。
使用PubMed和谷歌学术对与2008年至2012年AANA年会提交的摘要相关的所有已发表手稿进行在线搜索。摘要按展示类型（壁报与大会发言）分类，并记录所有已发表摘要的期刊和发表日期。进行描述性统计、逻辑回归和费舍尔精确检验，P <.05认为具有统计学意义。
2008年至2012年共有1508篇摘要提交至AANA年会，其中976篇摘要被接受展示（总体接受率为65%）。有328个大会发言（接受率为22%）和648个壁报展示（接受率为43%）。在976篇被接受的摘要中，479篇（49%）在3年内发表于同行评审期刊。大会发言和壁报展示的总体发表率分别为59%（n = 193）和44%（n = 286）。与壁报展示相比，大会发言在3年内发表的可能性显著更高（P <.0001；优势比1.8095，置信区间1.3826 - 2.3682）。大会发言和壁报展示的发表时间无差异（1.3 ± 1.2年对1.1 ± 1.3年，P =.0633）。在5年的研究期间，总体摘要接受率（P <.0001）和壁报展示摘要接受率（P <.0001）随时间显著增加，而大会发言摘要接受率没有增加（P =.5638）。最常见的发表期刊是《关节镜杂志》（n = 157，32.7%），其次是《美国运动医学杂志》（n = 93，19.4%）。
AANA年会展示摘要的总体发表率为49%，大会发言发表的可能性是壁报展示的1.8倍。总体摘要接受率和壁报展示摘要接受率随时间显著增加，而大会发言摘要接受率没有显著增加。
AANA年会展示摘要的发表率证明了该会议对科学文献发展的影响和重要性。
