Frańczuk B
Przegl Lek. 1989;46(4):381-4.
Here is shown a comparison of endurance in different types of connected trochanteric fractures by the use of angular and intramedullary Y nails. Studies were made on 24 isolated femora, upon which an osteotomy was performed so as to experimentally reconstruct trochanteric fractures of the II, III and IV degree. Bone fragments were connected by the use of angular or intramedullary Y nails. Such connected bones underwent the gradual increase of weight in order to test the endurance of the connections applied. It was established that the angular nail stabilizes fragments in fractures of the II degree, but in fractures of the III degree it can only serve as a bone suture. On the other hand it is of no use in connected fractures of the IV degree. The intramedullary Y nail stabilizes bone fragments well in fractures of the II and III degree, as well as in fractures of the IV degree. The connection of trochanteric fractures of the II degree by use of the intramedullary Y nail is more beneficial than connection by use of the angular nail due an approximately doubled endurance in connections of this kind.
本文展示了通过使用角形钉和髓内Y形钉对不同类型的转子间骨折进行耐力比较的研究。对24根孤立的股骨进行了研究,在这些股骨上进行截骨术,以实验性重建II度、III度和IV度转子间骨折。通过使用角形钉或髓内Y形钉连接骨碎片。对这些连接好的骨头逐渐增加重量,以测试所应用连接的耐力。结果表明,角形钉可稳定II度骨折的碎片,但在III度骨折中它只能起到骨缝合的作用。另一方面,它在IV度连接骨折中毫无用处。髓内Y形钉在II度、III度骨折以及IV度骨折中都能很好地稳定骨碎片。由于使用髓内Y形钉连接II度转子间骨折的耐力大约是使用角形钉连接的两倍,所以使用髓内Y形钉连接更为有益。