Eswaran Shanti L, Chey William D, Han-Markey Theresa, Ball Sarah, Jackson Kenya
Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
University of Michigan Health System, Michigan Clinical Research Unit and Nutrition Obesity Research Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec;111(12):1824-1832. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.434. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
There has been an increasing interest in the role of fermentable oligo-, di-, and monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We report results from the first randomized controlled trial of the low FODMAP diet in US adults with IBS and diarrhea (IBS-D). The objectives were to compare the efficacy of the low FODMAP diet vs. a diet based upon modified National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines (mNICE) on overall and individual symptoms in IBS-D patients.
This was a single-center, randomized-controlled trial of adult patients with IBS-D (Rome III) which compared 2 diet interventions. After a 2-week screening period, eligible patients were randomized to a low FODMAP or mNICE diet for 4 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of patients reporting adequate relief of IBS-D symptoms ≥50% of intervention weeks 3-4. Secondary outcomes included a composite end point which required response in both abdominal pain (≥30% reduction in mean daily pain score compared with baseline) and stool consistency (decrease in mean daily Bristol Stool Form of ≥1 compared with baseline), abdominal pain and stool consistency responders, and other key individual IBS symptoms assessed using daily questionnaires.
After screening, 92 subjects (65 women, median age 42.6 years) were randomized. Eighty-four patients completed the study (45 low FODMAP, 39 mNICE). Baseline demographics, symptom severity, and nutrient intake were similar between groups. Fifty-two percent of the low FODMAP vs. 41% of the mNICE group reported adequate relief of their IBS-D symptoms (P=0.31). Though there was no significant difference in the proportion of composite end point responders (P=0.13), the low FODMAP diet resulted in a higher proportion of abdominal pain responders compared with the mNICE group (51% vs. 23%, P=0.008). Compared with baseline scores, the low FODMAP diet led to greater reductions in average daily scores of abdominal pain, bloating, consistency, frequency, and urgency than the mNICE diet.
In this US trial, 40-50% of patients reported adequate relief of their IBS-D symptoms with the low FODMAP diet or a diet based on modified NICE guidelines. The low FODMAP diet led to significantly greater improvement in individual IBS symptoms, particularly pain and bloating, compared with the mNICE diet.
人们对可发酵的低聚糖、二糖、单糖和多元醇(FODMAPs)在肠易激综合征(IBS)中的作用越来越感兴趣。我们报告了美国成年腹泻型肠易激综合征(IBS-D)患者低FODMAP饮食的首个随机对照试验结果。目的是比较低FODMAP饮食与基于修改后的英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所指南(mNICE)的饮食对IBS-D患者总体和个体症状的疗效。
这是一项针对成年IBS-D(罗马III型)患者的单中心随机对照试验,比较了两种饮食干预措施。在为期2周的筛查期后,符合条件的患者被随机分配到低FODMAP饮食组或mNICE饮食组,为期4周。主要终点是在干预第3 - 4周期间报告IBS-D症状得到充分缓解(≥50%)的患者比例。次要结局包括一个复合终点,该终点要求腹痛(与基线相比,平均每日疼痛评分降低≥30%)和大便性状(与基线相比,平均每日布里斯托大便分型降低≥1)均有改善,腹痛和大便性状改善的患者,以及使用每日问卷评估的其他关键个体IBS症状。
筛查后,92名受试者(65名女性,中位年龄42.6岁)被随机分组。84名患者完成了研究(45名低FODMAP饮食组,39名mNICE饮食组)。两组之间的基线人口统计学、症状严重程度和营养摄入相似。低FODMAP饮食组有52%的患者报告IBS-D症状得到充分缓解,而mNICE饮食组为41%(P = 0.31)。虽然复合终点反应者的比例没有显著差异(P = 0.13),但与mNICE饮食组相比,低FODMAP饮食组腹痛缓解的患者比例更高(51%对23%,P = 0.008)。与基线评分相比,低FODMAP饮食比mNICE饮食在腹痛、腹胀、大便性状、频率和急迫感的平均每日评分上有更大幅度的降低。
在这项美国试验中,40 - 50%的患者报告低FODMAP饮食或基于修改后的NICE指南的饮食使他们的IBS-D症状得到充分缓解。与mNICE饮食相比,低FODMAP饮食在个体IBS症状,特别是疼痛和腹胀方面有显著更大的改善。