Clinical Neuroscience and Psychopharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, The Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, United States.
Clinical Neuroscience and Psychopharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, The Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, United States.
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Dec 30;246:255-260. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
A diminished capacity to reason about one's own or others' mood states (part of emotional intelligence, EI) may impair one's ability to respond to threat or frustration, leading to aggression and/or impulsivity. In this study, 1544 adult subjects completed the Trait-Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS), an assessment of perceived EI, in order to examine how attention to emotions, clarity of emotions, and repair of emotions were associated with aggression and impulsivity. Correlations among the TMMS subscales of Attention, Clarity, and Repair were all significant. Clarity moderated the relationship between Attention and Repair such that Attention correlated with Repair only at higher levels of Clarity. Aggression and Impulsivity were both associated with all three dimensions of perceived EI; however, Repair was associated more strongly with Aggression than Impulsivity, whereas the reverse was true for Clarity. Finally, a subsample of participants self-identified as having "anger problems" had lower TMMS scores for Clarity and Repair compared to "non-anger problem" participants. Adding aggression and impulsivity to the model eliminated these group differences. Results suggest that Clarity and Repair may be the most important aspect of perceived EI. Interventions that increase these components, along with effective mood regulation techniques, may potentially ameliorate impulsive aggressive behavior.
一个人对自己或他人情绪状态进行推理的能力下降(情绪智力的一部分,EI)可能会损害其对威胁或挫折的反应能力,导致攻击和/或冲动。在这项研究中,1544 名成年受试者完成了特质-元情绪量表(TMMS),这是对感知 EI 的评估,以检验注意力、情绪清晰度和情绪修复如何与攻击性和冲动性相关。TMMS 量表的注意力、清晰度和修复三个分量表之间的相关性均具有统计学意义。清晰度调节了注意力和修复之间的关系,使得注意力仅在更高的清晰度水平上与修复相关。攻击性和冲动性都与感知 EI 的三个维度有关;然而,修复与攻击性的相关性更强,而与冲动性的相关性较弱,而清晰度则相反。最后,一个参与者的亚样本自我识别为“愤怒问题”,其 TMMS 清晰度和修复得分低于“非愤怒问题”参与者。将攻击性和冲动性添加到模型中消除了这些组间差异。结果表明,清晰度和修复可能是感知 EI 中最重要的方面。增加这些成分以及有效的情绪调节技术的干预措施可能潜在地改善冲动的攻击行为。