• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国唇腭裂或颅面畸形患者医疗事故索赔趋势。

Trends in medical malpractice claims in patients with cleft or craniofacial abnormalities in the United States.

作者信息

Rawal Rounak B, Kilpatrick Lauren A, Wood Jeyhan S, Drake Amelia F

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, CB #7070, Physician's Office Building Room G-190, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7040, USA.

Division of Plastic Surgery, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, 7040 Burnett-Womack, CB #7195 Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7040, USA.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Nov;90:214-219. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.09.030. Epub 2016 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.09.030
PMID:27729136
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe medical malpractice trends in patients with cleft and/or craniofacial abnormalities.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A modified Delphi approach was used to gather search terms. Search settings included "all jury verdicts and settlements", with jurisdiction of "all states" and "all federal courts" (by court and circuit). A retrospective review of WestLawNext legal database was conducted. Cases were excluded if they did not have a direct association from the patient's craniofacial anomaly or if they were not related to malpractice.

RESULTS

Forty-two cases met inclusion criteria. Cases closed between 1981 and 2014 were included. The mean payment among claims with an indemnity payment was $3.9 million. Of cases brought to trial, 62% were in favor of the plaintiff. Amongst physicians named as co-defendants, pediatricians were most commonly named (24%), followed by plastic surgeons (16%), obstetricians (7.8%), and radiologists (7.8%). "Missed diagnosis" was the most common type of negligent claim (45%), followed by "surgical error" (21%), and "medication error" (17%). "Anoxic brain injury" resulted in the highest median indemnity payment for complication of patient management ($3.5 million), followed by "wrongful birth" ($1.03 million), and "minor physical injury" ($520,000). No specific type of negligent claim (p = 0.764) nor complication of patient management (p = 0.61) was associated with a greater indemnity payment. Mean indemnity payment was $920,000 prior to 2001 and $4.4 million after 2001 (p = 0.058).

CONCLUSIONS

Mean indemnity payments were fourteen-fold greater in patients as compared to those in the overall population ($3.9 million versus $274,887) and seven-fold greater than those in the average pediatric population ($3.9 million versus $520,923). All healthcare providers should be aware of the associated medical malpractice claims that may be incurred when treating patients at risk for these conditions.

摘要

目的

描述唇腭裂和/或颅面畸形患者的医疗事故趋势。

方法和材料

采用改良的德尔菲法收集检索词。检索设置包括“所有陪审团裁决和和解协议”,管辖范围为“所有州”和“所有联邦法院”(按法院和巡回法院)。对WestLawNext法律数据库进行回顾性审查。如果案件与患者的颅面畸形没有直接关联或与医疗事故无关,则予以排除。

结果

42例病例符合纳入标准。纳入了1981年至2014年结案的病例。有赔偿支付的索赔案件的平均赔偿金额为390万美元。在提交审判的案件中,62%的案件有利于原告。在被列为共同被告的医生中,儿科医生被提及的最为常见(24%),其次是整形外科医生(16%)、产科医生(7.8%)和放射科医生(7.8%)。“漏诊”是最常见的过失索赔类型(45%),其次是“手术失误”(21%)和“用药失误”(17%)。“缺氧性脑损伤”导致患者管理并发症的赔偿中位数最高(350万美元),其次是“错误出生”(103万美元)和“轻微身体伤害”(52万美元)。没有特定类型的过失索赔(p = 0.764)或患者管理并发症(p = 0.61)与更高的赔偿支付相关。2001年之前的平均赔偿金额为92万美元,2001年之后为440万美元(p = 0.058)。

结论

与普通人群相比,患者的平均赔偿金额高出14倍(390万美元对274,887美元),比普通儿科人群高出7倍(390万美元对520,923美元)。所有医疗保健提供者都应意识到,在治疗有这些疾病风险的患者时可能会产生相关的医疗事故索赔。

相似文献

1
Trends in medical malpractice claims in patients with cleft or craniofacial abnormalities in the United States.美国唇腭裂或颅面畸形患者医疗事故索赔趋势。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Nov;90:214-219. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.09.030. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
2
Delayed Diagnosis Is the Primary Cause of Sarcoma Litigation: Analysis of Malpractice Claims in the United States.延迟诊断是肉瘤诉讼的主要原因:美国医疗事故索赔分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Oct;478(10):2239-2253. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001340.
3
An epidemiologic study of closed emergency department malpractice claims in a national database of physician malpractice insurers.一项在医师职业责任保险公司全国数据库中进行的封闭急诊室医疗事故索赔的流行病学研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 May;17(5):553-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00729.x.
4
Medical Malpractice in Pediatric Orthopaedics: A Systematic Review of US Case Law.小儿骨科医疗事故:美国判例法的系统综述
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Jul;39(6):e482-e486. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001348.
5
Determinants of brain tumor malpractice litigation outcome and indemnity payments: a 29-year nationwide analysis.脑瘤医疗事故诉讼结果和赔偿支付的决定因素:29 年全国范围分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Nov;49(5):E21. doi: 10.3171/2020.8.FOCUS20601.
6
Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate Surgery: Malpractice Litigation Outcomes.唇腭裂手术:医疗事故诉讼结果
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017 Jan;54(1):75-79. doi: 10.1597/15-285. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
7
Hearing loss resulting in malpractice litigation: what physicians need to know.导致医疗事故诉讼的听力损失:医生需要了解的内容。
Laryngoscope. 2013 Jan;123(1):112-7. doi: 10.1002/lary.23608. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
8
Craniofacial Surgery and Adverse Outcomes: An Inquiry Into Medical Negligence.颅面外科手术与不良后果:对医疗过失的调查
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015 Jul;124(7):515-22. doi: 10.1177/0003489414567937. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
9
Analysis of closed malpractice medical claims against Taiwanese EDs: 2003 to 2012.2003年至2012年台湾急诊部门医疗失误索赔结案分析
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;32(9):990-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.05.033. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
10
Trends in malpractice claims for obstetric and gynecologic procedures, 2005 through 2014.2005年至2014年妇产科手术医疗事故索赔趋势。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):340.e1-340.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.037. Epub 2017 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Malpractice Claims of Internal Medicine Involving Diagnostic and System Errors in Japan.日本内科涉及诊断和系统错误的医疗事故索赔。
Intern Med. 2021 Sep 15;60(18):2919-2925. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.6652-20. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
2
A detailed analysis of pediatric surgical malpractice claims in Germany: what is the probability of a pediatric surgeon to be accused or convicted?德国小儿外科医疗事故索赔的详细分析:小儿外科医生被指控或定罪的概率是多少?
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Sep;406(6):2053-2057. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02069-6. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
3
Factors and impact of physicians' diagnostic errors in malpractice claims in Japan.
日本医疗事故诉讼中医师诊断错误的因素和影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 3;15(8):e0237145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237145. eCollection 2020.