Suppr超能文献

导水管狭窄是否会影响正常压力脑积水的腰椎灌注试验?

Does aqueductal stenosis influence the lumbar infusion test in normal-pressure hydrocephalus?

作者信息

González-Martínez Emilio Luis, Santamarta David

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Álava, Vitoria, Spain.

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of León, León, Spain.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Dec;158(12):2305-2310. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2975-1. Epub 2016 Oct 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Late-onset idiopathic aqueductal stenosis may present with clinical features indistinct from idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). Moreover, aqueductal stenosis (AS) is not always detected by conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this study was to compare the hydrodynamic pattern among NPH patients according to the patency of the aqueduct.

METHODS

Fifty-six consecutive lumbar infusion tests were performed in patients with NPH syndrome. Precipitating causes of hydrocephalus were excluded, and aqueductal patency was examined through high-resolution, T2-weighted 3D MRI. Patients were classified into two groups: non-patent aqueduct and patent aqueduct. Mean values of pressure and pulse amplitude were obtained from basal and plateau stages of infusion studies.

RESULTS

Twelve of 56 patients with NPH-like symptoms presented with morphological AS (21.4 %). Patent aqueduct and non-patent aqueduct groups had similar values of mean opening lumbar pressure (8.2 vs. 8.1 mmHg), and mean opening pulse amplitude (3.1 vs. 2.9 mmHg). Mean pressure in the plateau stage (28.6 vs. 23.2 mmHg), and mean pulse amplitude in the plateau stage (12.5 vs. 10.6 mmHg) were higher in the patent aqueduct group. These differences were not statistically significant. Only Rout was significantly higher in the patent aqueduct group (13.6 vs. 10.1 mmHg/ml/min). One-third of NPH patients with AS presented Rout >12 mmHg/ml/min.

CONCLUSIONS

No differences in mean pressure or pulse amplitude during basal and plateau epochs of the lumbar infusion test in NPH patients were detected, regardless of aqueductal patency. However, Rout was significantly higher in patients with patent aqueduct.

摘要

背景

迟发性特发性导水管狭窄的临床特征可能与特发性正常压力脑积水(NPH)难以区分。此外,传统磁共振成像(MRI)并不总能检测到导水管狭窄(AS)。本研究的目的是根据导水管的通畅情况比较NPH患者的流体动力学模式。

方法

对NPH综合征患者连续进行了56次腰椎灌注试验。排除脑积水的诱发原因,并通过高分辨率T2加权三维MRI检查导水管通畅情况。患者分为两组:导水管不通畅组和导水管通畅组。从灌注研究的基础期和平台期获得压力和脉冲幅度的平均值。

结果

56例有NPH样症状的患者中有12例表现为形态学上的AS(21.4%)。导水管通畅组和不通畅组的平均开放腰段压力值(8.2对8.1mmHg)和平均开放脉冲幅度(3.1对2.9mmHg)相似。导水管通畅组平台期的平均压力(28.6对23.2mmHg)和平台期的平均脉冲幅度(12.5对10.6mmHg)更高。这些差异无统计学意义。只有导水管通畅组的Rout显著更高(13.6对10.1mmHg/ml/min)。三分之一的AS型NPH患者Rout>12mmHg/ml/min。

结论

无论导水管是否通畅,NPH患者在腰椎灌注试验的基础期和平台期的平均压力或脉冲幅度均无差异。然而,导水管通畅的患者Rout显著更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验