• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[从德国监护法的意义上讲,什么是“对健康的严重损害”?]

[What is a "Considerable Damage to One's Health" in the Sense of German Guardianship Law?].

作者信息

Steinert Tilman, Heinz Andreas, Hohl-Radke Felix, Koller Manfred, Müller Jürgen, Müller Sabine, Zinkler Martin

机构信息

Zentrum für Psychiatrie Südwürttemberg, Universität Ulm.

Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin.

出版信息

Psychiatr Prax. 2016 Oct;43(7):395-399. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-116649. Epub 2016 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1055/s-0042-116649
PMID:27733009
Abstract

The term of a "considerable damage to one's health" is central in German guardianship law with respect to judge's decisions on involuntary commitment and coercive treatment. A legal definition has not been provided, and up to now no explanations from the part of medicine have been available what a "considerable damage to one's health" is in the case of mental illness and how it can be determined. A consensus paper of the German Association of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (DGPPN) explains four possible scenarios of manifestation of such kind of damage, corresponding to somatic illnesses: evidence of structural brain lesions (rare), subjective suffering (sufficient, but not necessary), impairment of functioning in important areas of life, and severe impairment of social participation (e. g. by dangerous behaviour against others). This view corresponds with the WHO's bio-psycho-social concept of health.

摘要

在德国监护法中,就法官关于非自愿住院和强制治疗的裁决而言,“对健康造成相当大损害”这一术语至关重要。法律并未给出其定义,截至目前,医学方面也未就精神疾病情况下的“对健康造成相当大损害”是什么以及如何确定给出解释。德国精神病学和心理治疗协会(DGPPN)的一份共识文件解释了这种损害表现的四种可能情形,这与躯体疾病相对应:脑结构病变的证据(罕见)、主观痛苦(充分但非必要)、生活重要领域功能受损以及社会参与严重受损(例如因对他人的危险行为)。这一观点与世界卫生组织的生物 - 心理 - 社会健康概念相符。

相似文献

1
[What is a "Considerable Damage to One's Health" in the Sense of German Guardianship Law?].[从德国监护法的意义上讲,什么是“对健康的严重损害”?]
Psychiatr Prax. 2016 Oct;43(7):395-399. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-116649. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
2
[Involuntary placement and coercive treatment in Germany. Subtle differences within the legal framework].[德国的非自愿安置与强制治疗。法律框架内的细微差别]
Psychiatr Prax. 2009 Mar;36(2):79-84. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1067439. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
3
[Compulsory treatment under guardianship legislation].[监护立法下的强制治疗]
Psychiatr Prax. 2006 May;33(4):196-201. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-941626.
4
[Psychiatry caught between emergency response and therapy: compulsory treatment following the jurisprudence of the federal constitutional court and the federal supreme court].[精神病学在应急响应与治疗之间左右为难:依据联邦宪法法院和联邦最高法院的判例法进行的强制治疗]
Psychiatr Prax. 2013 Oct;40(7):365-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1349560. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
5
Balancing autonomy and risk: a failure of nerve in England and Wales?平衡自主权与风险:英格兰和威尔士的神经失能?
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2007 Jan-Feb;30(1):71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2005.08.013. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
6
[Guardianship law in routine nursing care. Determining mental competence].[常规护理中的监护法。确定精神行为能力]
Pflege Z. 2013 Apr;66(4):240-2.
7
[The development of legal guardianship and involuntary treatment in a Bavarian catchment area in comparison to trends at the federal state and the federal level between 1999 and 2009].[1999年至2009年巴伐利亚州一个集水区法定监护和非自愿治疗的发展情况与联邦州及联邦层面趋势的比较]
Psychiatr Prax. 2011 May;38(4):190-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1266080. Epub 2011 May 5.
8
[Thiel A, Röttgers H.R. Compulsory treatment under guardianship legislation. Psychiat Prax 2006; 33: 196-201].[蒂尔 A,罗特格斯 H.R. 监护立法下的强制治疗。《精神病学实践》2006 年;33: 196 - 201]
Psychiatr Prax. 2006 Sep;33(6):305-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-951403.
9
Beyond the black letter of the law: an empirical study of an individual judge's decision process for civil commitment hearings.超越法律条文:对一名法官在民事强制住院听证会上决策过程的实证研究
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1997;25(1):79-94.
10
[Psychiatric treatment--legal aspects].[精神科治疗——法律层面]
Psychiatr Prax. 2014 Jul;41 Suppl 1:S44-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1369907. Epub 2014 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
[Focus: forensic psychiatric commitment and solution approaches].
Nervenarzt. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1007/s00115-025-01854-2.
2
[Autoimmune encephalitis-Diagnostic and therapeutic decision tree from a psychiatric, neurological and ethico-legal point of view : Approach in cases of lack of ability to give consent and permissibility of compulsory treatment].[自身免疫性脑炎——从精神病学、神经病学和伦理法律角度看诊断与治疗决策树:无同意能力情况下的处理及强制治疗的可允许性]
Nervenarzt. 2020 Feb;91(2):122-130. doi: 10.1007/s00115-019-00802-1.