Blokker Britt M, Weustink Annick C, Hunink M G Myriam, Oosterhuis J Wolter
Departments of Pathology and Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 13;11(10):e0163811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163811. eCollection 2016.
Hospital autopsies, vanishing worldwide, need to be requested by clinicians and consented to by next-of-kin. The aim of this prospective observational study was to examine how often and why clinicians do not request an autopsy, and for what reasons next-of-kin allow, or refuse it.
Clinicians at the Erasmus University Medical Centre were asked to complete a questionnaire when an adult patient had died. Questionnaires on 1000 consecutive naturally deceased adults were collected. If possible, missing data in the questionnaires were retrieved from the electronic patient record.
Data from 958 (96%) questionnaires was available for analysis. In 167/958 (17·4%) cases clinicians did not request an autopsy, and in 641/791 (81·0%) cases next-of-kin did not give consent. The most important reason for both clinicians (51·5%) and next-of-kin (51·0%) to not request or consent to an autopsy was an assumed known cause of death. Their second reason was that the deceased had gone through a long illness (9·6% and 29·5%). The third reason for next-of-kin was mutilation of the deceased's body by the autopsy procedure (16·1%). Autopsy rates were highest among patients aged 30-39 years, Europeans, suddenly and/or unexpectedly deceased patients, and tissue and/or organ donors. The intensive care and emergency units achieved the highest autopsy rates, and surgical wards the lowest.
The main reason for not requesting or allowing an autopsy is the assumption that the cause of death is known. This is a dangerous premise, because it is a self-fulfilling prophecy. Clinicians should be aware, and communicate with the next of kin, that autopsies not infrequently disclose unexpected findings, which might have changed patient management. Mutilation of the deceased's body seems a minor consideration of next-of-kin, though how it really affects autopsy rates, should be studied by offering minimally or non-invasive autopsy methods.
医院尸检在全球范围内逐渐减少,需要临床医生提出申请并经近亲同意。这项前瞻性观察性研究的目的是调查临床医生不申请尸检的频率和原因,以及近亲允许或拒绝尸检的原因。
伊拉斯姆斯大学医学中心的临床医生在成年患者死亡时被要求填写一份问卷。收集了1000例连续自然死亡成年人的问卷。如有可能,问卷中的缺失数据从电子病历中获取。
958份(96%)问卷的数据可供分析。在167/958(17.4%)的病例中,临床医生未申请尸检,在641/791(81.0%)的病例中,近亲未给予同意。临床医生(51.5%)和近亲(51.0%)不申请或不同意尸检的最重要原因是假定已知死亡原因。其次是死者经历了长期疾病(9.6%和29.5%)。近亲的第三个原因是尸检程序对死者尸体造成毁损(16.1%)。尸检率在30-39岁患者、欧洲人、突然和/或意外死亡患者以及组织和/或器官捐献者中最高。重症监护病房和急诊科的尸检率最高,外科病房最低。
不申请或不允许尸检的主要原因是假定已知死亡原因。这是一个危险的前提,因为这是一个自我实现的预言。临床医生应该意识到,并与近亲沟通,尸检经常会揭示意想不到的发现,这可能会改变患者的治疗方案。尽管通过提供微创或无创尸检方法研究其对尸检率的实际影响,但死者尸体毁损似乎是近亲较少考虑的因素。