Macher J M, Mendell M J, Chen W, Kumagai K
California Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Laboratory Branch, Richmond, CA, USA.
Indoor Air. 2017 May;27(3):599-608. doi: 10.1111/ina.12346. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
Subjective indicators of building dampness consistently have been linked to health, but they are, at best, semi-quantitative, and objective and quantitative assessments of dampness are also needed to study dampness-related health effects. Investigators can readily and non-destructively measure the "moisture content" (MC) of building materials with hand-held moisture meters. However, MC does not indicate the amount of the water in a material that is available to microorganisms for growth, that is, the "water activity" (A ). Unfortunately, A has not been readily measurable in the field and is not relatable to MC unless previously determined experimentally, because for the same moisture meter reading, A can differ across materials as well as during moisture adsorption vs desorption. To determine the A s that correspond to MC levels, stable air relative humidities were generated in a glove box above saturated, aqueous salt solutions, and the A of gypsum board and the relative humidity of the chamber air were tracked until they reached equilibrium. Strong correlations were observed between meter readings and gravimetrically determined MC (r=.91-1.00), among readings with three moisture meters (r=.87-.98), and between meter readings and gypsum board A (r=.77-.99).
建筑潮湿的主观指标一直与健康相关,但充其量只是半定量的,因此还需要对潮湿进行客观和定量评估,以研究与潮湿相关的健康影响。研究人员可以使用手持式湿度计轻松且无损地测量建筑材料的“含水量”(MC)。然而,含水量并不能表明材料中可供微生物生长的水量,即“水分活度”(A)。不幸的是,水分活度在现场不易测量,并且除非事先通过实验确定,否则它与含水量无关,因为对于相同的湿度计读数,水分活度在不同材料之间以及在吸湿和解吸过程中可能会有所不同。为了确定与含水量水平相对应的水分活度,在饱和盐溶液上方的手套箱中产生稳定的空气相对湿度,并跟踪石膏板的水分活度和箱内空气的相对湿度,直到它们达到平衡。在湿度计读数与重量法测定的含水量之间(r = 0.91 - 1.00)、在使用三种湿度计的读数之间(r = 0.87 - 0.98)以及在湿度计读数与石膏板水分活度之间(r = 0.77 - 0.99)均观察到了强相关性。