Mayko Zachary M, Benetz Beth Ann, Menegay Harry, Donovan Christopher P, Stoeger Christopher G, Terry Mark A, Lass Jonathan H
*Lions VisionGift, Portland, OR;†Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH;‡University Hospitals Eye Institute, Cleveland, OH;§School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; and‖Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR.
Cornea. 2016 Dec;35(12):1556-1561. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001044.
To evaluate a single eye bank's measurement of endothelial cell density (ECD) of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts before and after preparation using 2 separate counting methods.
A series of 60 donor tissues were prepared for DMEK surgery. One to 4 specular images of the central endothelium were taken both before and after preparation, and ECDs were evaluated for a total of 345 unique images. Images were then masked and provided to the Cornea Image Analysis Reading Center (CIARC) for independent analysis.
Before preparation, average eye bank-determined ECD with the center method was 2678 ± 259 cells/mm and was 2599 ± 280 cells/mm CIARC-determined by the variable frame method (P < 0.001, n = 176). After preparation, eye bank-determined ECD was 2719 ± 265 cells/mm and CIARC-determined ECD was 2615 ± 344 cells/mm (P < 0.001, n = 169). The difference in ECD before and after DMEK preparation was not found to be statistically significant when evaluated using either analysis method (P = 0.19; P = 0.64) before and after preparation, respectively.
Although the absolute ECD value may differ by the analysis method statistically, pre- and post-DMEK preparation ECDs did not significantly change by either analysis method. Other methods such as vital staining to assess tissue damage after preparation in conjunction with specular microscopy are suggested.
使用两种不同的计数方法评估单一眼库对Descemet膜内皮角膜移植术(DMEK)移植物制备前后内皮细胞密度(ECD)的测量。
为DMEK手术准备了一系列60个供体组织。在制备前后分别拍摄1至4张中央内皮的镜面反射图像,共评估了345张独特图像的ECD。然后对图像进行遮罩,并提供给角膜图像分析阅读中心(CIARC)进行独立分析。
制备前,眼库采用中心法测定的平均ECD为2678±259个细胞/mm²,CIARC采用可变框架法测定的为2599±280个细胞/mm²(P<0.001,n=176)。制备后,眼库测定的ECD为2719±265个细胞/mm²,CIARC测定的ECD为2615±344个细胞/mm²(P<0.001,n=169)。在制备前后分别使用两种分析方法评估时,未发现DMEK制备前后ECD的差异具有统计学意义(P=0.19;P=0.64)。
尽管绝对ECD值可能因分析方法而在统计学上有所不同,但两种分析方法均显示DMEK制备前后的ECD没有显著变化。建议采用其他方法,如活体染色结合镜面显微镜来评估制备后组织的损伤情况。