Suppr超能文献

社区获得性肺炎患者血行性细菌感染的预测因素及血培养作为预后工具的临床应用价值

Predictive factors of true bacteremia and the clinical utility of blood cultures as a prognostic tool in patients with community-onset pneumonia.

作者信息

Lee Jong Hoo, Kim Yee Hyung

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct;95(41):e5058. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005058.

Abstract

Although blood cultures (BCs) are an important component of diagnostic practice for antibiotic management in patients with pneumonia, several studies have questioned whether they should be performed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive factors of bacteremia and the role of BCs in patients with community-onset pneumonia (community-acquired pneumonia and healthcare-associated pneumonia).This study was retrospectively conducted in patients with community-onset pneumonia who were hospitalized at Jeju National University Hospital between January 2012 and December 2014. A true bacteremia (TB) group and a contaminants or negative bacteremia (CNB) group were classified according to the bacterial growth on the BC media and were investigated for the clinical relevance of the BCs.We enrolled 785 patients; the TB group and the CNB group contained 36 patients (4.5%) and 749 (95.4%) patients, respectively. Only 10 patients (1.2%) required a change in antibiotic therapy based on the BC results (3 patients with an escalation, 7 with a de-escalation). There was no significant difference between the community-acquired pneumonia and the healthcare-associated pneumonia groups with regard to the rate of antibiotic change due to the BC results (1.1% vs 1.4%; P = 0.751). Chronic liver disease (odds ratio [OR] 2.973, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.099-8.037), a confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure, age ≥65 (CURB-65) score of 4 to 5 points (OR 3.484, 95% CI 1.304-9.307), and Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) class V (OR 2.405, 95% CI 1.007-5.743) were independently associated with TB. In patients with PSI class V and a CURB-65 score of 4 to 5 points, the TB group tended to show a higher inhospital mortality rate than the CNB group (50.0% vs 29.4%; P = 0.060, 60.0% vs 42.5%; P = 0.480). The areas under the curve for PSI score and CURB-65 score for predicting TB revealed an increased tendency compared with that of C-reactive protein (0.72, 95% CI 0.630-0.809; and 0.72, 95% CI 0.622-0.819 vs 0.629, 95% CI 0.522-0.735, respectively).It seemed reasonable to selectively conduct BC in patients hospitalized with severe community-onset pneumonia based upon its low overall positive rate, its effects on antimicrobial modification, and the associations of TB with the severity indices of pneumonia.

摘要

尽管血培养(BCs)是肺炎患者抗生素管理诊断实践的重要组成部分,但多项研究对是否应进行血培养提出了质疑。本研究的目的是评估菌血症的预测因素以及血培养在社区获得性肺炎(社区获得性肺炎和医疗保健相关肺炎)患者中的作用。本研究对2012年1月至2014年12月在济州国立大学医院住院的社区获得性肺炎患者进行了回顾性研究。根据血培养培养基上的细菌生长情况将真菌血症(TB)组和污染物或阴性菌血症(CNB)组进行分类,并研究血培养的临床相关性。我们纳入了785例患者;TB组和CNB组分别有36例(4.5%)和749例(95.4%)患者。仅10例(1.2%)患者根据血培养结果需要更改抗生素治疗(3例升级,7例降级)。社区获得性肺炎组和医疗保健相关肺炎组因血培养结果导致的抗生素更改率无显著差异(1.1%对1.4%;P = 0.751)。慢性肝病(比值比[OR] 2.973,95%置信区间[CI] 1.099 - 8.037)、意识模糊、尿素、呼吸频率、血压、年龄≥65岁(CURB - 65)评分4至5分(OR 3.484,95% CI 1.304 - 9.307)以及肺炎严重程度指数(PSI)V级(OR 2.405,95% CI 1.007 - 5.743)与TB独立相关。在PSI V级且CURB - 65评分4至5分的患者中,TB组的院内死亡率倾向于高于CNB组(50.0%对29.4%;P = 0.060,60.0%对42.5%;P = 0.480)。预测TB的PSI评分和CURB - 65评分的曲线下面积与C反应蛋白相比呈增加趋势(分别为0.72,95% CI (0.630 - 0.809);0.72, 95% CI (0.622 - 0.819)对0.629, 95% CI (0.522 - 0.735))。基于其总体阳性率低、对抗菌药物调整的影响以及TB与肺炎严重程度指数的关联,对重症社区获得性肺炎住院患者选择性进行血培养似乎是合理的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6740/5072946/0d42520ac081/medi-95-e5058-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验