Newsom Catherine, Schut Henk, Stroebe Margaret S, Wilson Stewart, Birrell John
Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 14;11(10):e0164005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164005. eCollection 2016.
This study assessed the validity of the Indicator of Bereavement Adaptation Cruse Scotland (IBACS). Designed for use in clinical and non-clinical settings, the IBACS measures severity of grief symptoms and risk of developing complications.
N = 196 (44 male, 152 female) help-seeking, bereaved Scottish adults participated at two timepoints: T1 (baseline) and T2 (after 18 months). Four validated assessment instruments were administered: CORE-R, ICG-R, IES-R, SCL-90-R. Discriminative ability was assessed using ROC curve analysis. Concurrent validity was tested through correlation analysis at T1. Predictive validity was assessed using correlation analyses and ROC curve analysis. Optimal IBACS cutoff values were obtained by calculating a maximal Youden index J in ROC curve analysis. Clinical implications were compared across instruments.
ROC curve analysis results (AUC = .84, p < .01, 95% CI between .77 and .90) indicated the IBACS is a good diagnostic instrument for assessing complicated grief. Positive correlations (p < .01, 2-tailed) with all four instruments at T1 demonstrated the IBACS' concurrent validity, strongest with complicated grief measures (r = .82). Predictive validity was shown to be fair in T2 ROC curve analysis results (n = 67, AUC = .78, 95% CI between .65 and .92; p < .01). Predictive validity was also supported by stable positive correlations between IBACS and other instruments at T2. Clinical indications were found not to differ across instruments.
The IBACS offers effective grief symptom and risk assessment for use by non-clinicians. Indications are sufficient to support intake assessment for a stepped model of bereavement intervention.
本研究评估了苏格兰克鲁斯丧亲适应指标(IBACS)的有效性。IBACS旨在用于临床和非临床环境,用于测量悲伤症状的严重程度以及出现并发症的风险。
196名(44名男性,152名女性)寻求帮助的丧亲苏格兰成年人在两个时间点参与研究:T1(基线)和T2(18个月后)。使用了四种经过验证的评估工具:CORE-R、ICG-R、IES-R、SCL-90-R。使用ROC曲线分析评估判别能力。在T1通过相关性分析测试同时效度。使用相关性分析和ROC曲线分析评估预测效度。通过在ROC曲线分析中计算最大约登指数J来获得最佳的IBACS临界值。比较了各工具之间的临床意义。
ROC曲线分析结果(AUC = 0.84,p < 0.01,95%CI在0.77至0.90之间)表明,IBACS是评估复杂性悲伤的良好诊断工具。在T1与所有四种工具的正相关(p < 0.01,双侧)证明了IBACS的同时效度,与复杂性悲伤测量的相关性最强(r = 0.82)。在T2的ROC曲线分析结果中显示预测效度尚可(n = 67,AUC = 0.78,95%CI在0.65至0.92之间;p < 0.01)。T2时IBACS与其他工具之间稳定的正相关也支持了预测效度。发现各工具之间的临床指征没有差异。
IBACS为非临床医生提供了有效的悲伤症状和风险评估。指征足以支持对丧亲干预阶梯模型的入院评估。