Simmons Megan, Guerra-Reyes Lucia, Meyerson Beth, Adams Kristin, Sanders Stephanie
Department of Applied Health Science, Indiana University-Bloomington School of Public Health, Bloomington, Indiana; Rural Center for AIDS/STD Prevention, Indiana University-Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana; The Kinsey Institute, Indiana University-Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana.
Department of Applied Health Science, Indiana University-Bloomington School of Public Health, Bloomington, Indiana.
Womens Health Issues. 2016 Nov-Dec;26(6):628-633. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
In 2014, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Office of Population Affairs released a document entitled Providing Quality Family Planning Services (QFP), which outlined recommendations for delivery of family planning services using a client-centered approach. These aimed to standardize service provision and address numerous reproductive health challenges. To date, little is known about QFP implementation or the factors influencing its adoption by clinicians.
Semistructured interviews were conducted with 16 family planning providers at Title X-funded clinics in Indiana and Missouri to measure provider attitudes toward the QFP, their influence on adoption of the recommendations, and other barriers to QFP implementation. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed in Nvivo. Using the diffusion of innovation theory as a framework, we identify themes related to innovation adoption.
Findings suggest that a provider's values related to client-centered counseling and views regarding the relative advantage of the QFP are key factors influencing adoption. Participants identified a number of structural and interpersonal barriers to implementation including misinterpretation of the QFP and billing issues.
Although participants expressed that QFP was an improvement over previous guidelines, misalignment of the recommendations with professional values and experiences, lack of clarity of the guidelines, and logistical issues serve as major barriers to adoption and implementation. These findings inform our understanding of policy adoption. Increased training and precise messaging is necessary to improve adoption of QFP at Title X clinics.
2014年,疾病控制与预防中心以及人口事务办公室发布了一份题为《提供优质计划生育服务》(QFP)的文件,其中概述了采用以客户为中心的方法提供计划生育服务的建议。这些建议旨在规范服务提供,并应对众多生殖健康挑战。迄今为止,对于QFP的实施情况或影响临床医生采用该建议的因素知之甚少。
对印第安纳州和密苏里州由第十类计划资助的诊所的16名计划生育服务提供者进行了半结构化访谈,以衡量提供者对QFP的态度、他们对采用这些建议的影响以及QFP实施的其他障碍。访谈内容逐字记录,并在Nvivo中进行分析。以创新扩散理论为框架,我们确定了与创新采用相关的主题。
研究结果表明,提供者与以客户为中心的咨询相关的价值观以及对QFP相对优势的看法是影响采用的关键因素。参与者指出了实施过程中的一些结构和人际障碍,包括对QFP的误解和计费问题。
尽管参与者表示QFP比以前的指南有所改进,但建议与专业价值观和经验的不一致、指南缺乏清晰度以及后勤问题是采用和实施的主要障碍。这些发现有助于我们理解政策的采用情况。增加培训和明确信息传递对于提高第十类计划诊所对QFP的采用率是必要的。