Bartelink Imke H, Lalmohamed Arief, van Reij Elisabeth M L, Dvorak Christopher C, Savic Rada M, Zwaveling Juliette, Bredius Robbert G M, Egberts Antoine C G, Bierings Marc, Kletzel Morris, Shaw Peter J, Nath Christa E, Hempel George, Ansari Marc, Krajinovic Maja, Théorêt Yves, Duval Michel, Keizer Ron J, Bittencourt Henrique, Hassan Moustapha, Güngör Tayfun, Wynn Robert F, Veys Paul, Cuvelier Geoff D E, Marktel Sarah, Chiesa Robert, Cowan Morton J, Slatter Mary A, Stricherz Melisa K, Jennissen Cathryn, Long-Boyle Janel R, Boelens Jaap Jan
Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA.
Clinical Pharmacy Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Lancet Haematol. 2016 Nov;3(11):e526-e536. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30114-4. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
Intravenous busulfan combined with therapeutic drug monitoring to guide dosing improves outcomes after allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The best method to estimate busulfan exposure and optimum exposure in children or young adults remains unclear. We therefore assessed three approaches to estimate intravenous busulfan exposure (expressed as cumulative area under the curve [AUC]) and associated busulfan AUC with clinical outcomes in children or young adults undergoing allogeneic HCT.
In this retrospective analysis, patients from 15 centres in the Netherlands, USA, Canada, Switzerland, UK, Italy, Germany, and Australia who received a busulfan-based conditioning regimen between March 18, 2001, and Feb 12, 2015, were included. Cumulative AUC was calculated by numerical integration using non-linear mixed effect modelling (AUC), non-compartmental analysis (AUC from 0 to infinity [AUC] and to the next dose [AUC]), and by individual centres using various approaches (AUC). The main outcome of interest was event-free survival. Other outcomes of interest were graft failure or relapse, or both; transplantation-related mortality; acute toxicity (veno-occlusive disease or acute graft versus-host disease [GvHD]); chronic GvHD; overall survival; and chronic-GvHD-free event-free survival. We used propensity-score-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models, Weibull models, and Fine-Gray competing risk regressions for statistical analyses.
790 patients were enrolled, 674 of whom were included: 274 (41%) with malignant and 400 (59%) with non-malignant disease. Median age was 4·5 years (IQR 1·4-10·7). The median busulfan AUC was 74·4 mg × h/L (95% CI 31·1-104·6), which correlated with the standardised method AUC (r=0·74), but the latter correlated poorly with AUC (r=0·35). Estimated 2-year event-free survival was 69·7% (95% CI 66·2-73·0). Event-free survival at 2 years was 77·0% (95% CI 72·1-82·9) in the 257 patients with an optimum intravenous busulfan AUC of 78-101 mg × h/L compared with 66·1% (60·9-71·4) in the 235 patients at the low historical target of 58-86 mg × h/L and 49·5% (29·2-66·0) in the 44 patients with a high (>101 mg × h/L) busulfan AUC (p=0·011). Compared with the low AUC group, graft failure or relapse occurred less frequently in the optimum AUC group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·57, 95% CI 0·39-0·84; p=0·0041). Acute toxicity (HR 1·69, 1·12-2·57; p=0·013) and transplantation-related mortality (2·99, 1·82-4·92; p<0·0001) were significantly higher in the high AUC group (>101 mg × h/L) than in the low AUC group (<78 mg × h/L), independent of indication; no difference was noted between AUC groups for chronic GvHD (<78 mg × h/L vs ≥78 mg × h/L, HR 1·30, 95% CI 0·73-2·33; p=0·37).
Improved clinical outcomes are likely to be achieved by targeting the busulfan AUC to 78-101 mg × h/L using a new validated pharmacokinetic model for all indications.
Research Allocation Program and the UCSF Helen Friller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Mt Zion Health Fund of the University of California, San Francisco.
异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)后,静脉注射白消安并结合治疗药物监测以指导给药可改善治疗效果。目前尚不清楚评估儿童或年轻成人白消安暴露量及最佳暴露量的最佳方法。因此,我们评估了三种估算静脉注射白消安暴露量(以曲线下面积[AUC]表示)的方法,并将其与接受异基因HCT的儿童或年轻成人的临床结局相关联。
在这项回顾性分析中,纳入了来自荷兰、美国、加拿大、瑞士、英国、意大利、德国和澳大利亚15个中心的患者,这些患者在2001年3月18日至2015年2月12日期间接受了基于白消安的预处理方案。累积AUC通过使用非线性混合效应模型(AUC)、非房室分析(从0到无穷大的AUC[AUC]和到下一剂的AUC[AUC])进行数值积分计算,以及由各个中心使用各种方法(AUC)计算。主要关注的结局是无事件生存期。其他关注的结局包括移植失败或复发,或两者皆有;移植相关死亡率;急性毒性(静脉闭塞性疾病或急性移植物抗宿主病[GvHD]);慢性GvHD;总生存期;以及无慢性GvHD的无事件生存期。我们使用倾向评分调整的Cox比例风险模型、Weibull模型和Fine-Gray竞争风险回归进行统计分析。
共纳入790例患者(67例被排除),其中274例(41%)患有恶性疾病,400例(59%)患有非恶性疾病。中位年龄为4.5岁(IQR 1.4-10.7)。白消安AUC中位数为74.4mg×h/L(95%CI 31.1-104.6),与标准化方法AUC相关(r=0.74),但后者与AUC相关性较差(r=0.35)。估计2年无事件生存率为69.7%(95%CI 66.2-73.0)。257例静脉注射白消安AUC最佳值为78-101mg×h/L的患者2年无事件生存率为77.0%(95%CI 72.1-82.9),而235例历史低目标值58-86mg×h/L的患者为66.1%(60.9-71.4),44例白消安AUC高(>101mg×h/L)的患者为49.5%(29.2-66.0)(p=0.011)。与低AUC组相比,最佳AUC组移植失败或复发的发生率较低(风险比[HR]0.57,95%CI 0.39-0.84;p=0.0041)。高AUC组(>101mg×h/L)的急性毒性(HR 1.69,1.12-2.57;p=0.013)和移植相关死亡率(2.99,1.82-)显著高于低AUC组(<78mg×h/L),与适应症无关;AUC组之间慢性GvHD无差异(<78mg×h/L与≥78mg×h/L,HR 1.30,95%CI 0.73-2.33;p=0.37)。
使用新的经过验证的药代动力学模型将白消安AUC目标设定为78-101mg×h/L,可能改善所有适应症的临床结局。
研究分配计划以及加州大学旧金山分校海伦·弗里勒家庭综合癌症中心和加州大学旧金山分校锡安山健康基金。